首页> 外文期刊>Library Journal >Do We Want or Need Metasearching?
【24h】

Do We Want or Need Metasearching?

机译:我们是否需要元搜索?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There's no question that Internet users love Google-it's been my favorite since it was operating out of Stanford. Wouldn't users also love a similar system that allows them to search across subscription databases, their OPAC, and perhaps free web sites as well? We don't know. There have been no satisfaction studies published yet on metasearching, a new technology that lets users search across databases from diffrent vendors by using common search standards. Metasearching (a.k.a. federated searching or broadcast searching) is considered by some to be the next evolutionary step of database searching. Proponents believe that novice users, such as undergraduates, are baffled by the number of databases they have to choose from and need one common interface to meet all their research needs. A common interface, they claim, could wean novice searchers from using the Internet as their primary source tor research. Metasearching, then, could become the "new Google.
机译:毫无疑问,互联网用户喜欢Google –自从它在斯坦福之外运营以来,它一直是我的最爱。用户是否也不会喜欢类似的系统,使他们可以在订阅数据库,其OPAC以及免费网站之间进行搜索?我们不知道关于元搜索的满意度研究尚未发布,元搜索是一种新技术,它使用户可以使用通用搜索标准跨不同供应商的数据库进行搜索。有人认为元搜索(也称为联合搜索或广播搜索)是数据库搜索的下一步发展。支持者认为,诸如大学生这样的新手用户对他们必须选择的数据库数量感到困惑,他们需要一个通用的界面来满足他们所有的研究需求。他们声称,一个通用的界面可能会使新手搜索者无法使用互联网作为他们的主要研究来源。那么,元搜索可能会成为“新的Google。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号