首页> 外文期刊>Library Journal >THUMBS AND UP, DOWN
【24h】

THUMBS AND UP, DOWN

机译:拇指向上,向下

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

If you wanted to win a library election in 2006, what would have been the mythical perfect referenda? For building referenda, the sweet spot was hit with measures over $10 million, on a ballot sometime between September and December, with no other items on the ballot, in a general election, for a library serving a population under 100,000. For the perfect operating referenda, you'd fare best in a general election, but the other variables—other items on the ballot, timing, or size of population—don't appear to have the same impact. Interestingly, libraries serving the largest population—over 100,000—fared the best in operating referenda and the worst in building referenda. However, no referendum is ever perfect, so you end up with mixed results, as evidenced by the 105 efforts reported in 2006—36 building referenda and 69 operating.
机译:如果您想赢得2006年的图书馆选举,那么什么是神话般的完美公投?在进行全民公决时,最理想的地方是在9月至12月之间的某次投票中动用了超过1000万美元,而在大选中,没有其他项目可供10万以下人口使用的图书馆使用。对于完美的公投,您在大选中表现最好,但其他变量(选票上的其他项目,时间安排或人口规模)似乎没有相同的影响。有趣的是,服务人口最多(超过100,000)的图书馆在运营公投方面表现最好,而在建设公投方面表现最差。但是,没有任何一次公民投票是完美的,所以最终结果好坏参半,2006年报告了105项努力,其中36项是全民公决,而69项正在运作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号