首页> 外文期刊>learning_Memory >Lost forever or temporarily misplaced? The long debate about the nature of memory impairment
【24h】

Lost forever or temporarily misplaced? The long debate about the nature of memory impairment

机译:永远丢失还是暂时放错地方?关于记忆障碍本质的长期争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Studies of memory impairment in humans and experimental animals have been fundamental to learning about the organization of memory and its cellular and molecular substrates. When memory impairment occurs, especially after perturbations of the nervous system, the question inevitably arises whether the impairment reflects impaired information storage or impaired accessibility. This topic has been the subject of considerable commentary and experimental work over the years. In this reappraisal, I first consider four broad areas of behavioral study from the 1970s and 1980s that led to a dominant and compelling view of memory impairment as a deficit of information storage. Second, I identify some ambiguities that arise about how the terms “storage” and “retrieval” are applied, especially when the evidence is somewhat indirect and based on a behavioral-psychological level of analysis. I then review neurobiological findings that have been largely overlooked in these discussions. The relevant studies are ones where it has been possible to monitor neurons and synapses in direct relation to behavioral memory, for example, in animals with simple nervous systems and in single cell recordings from behaving monkeys. This work provides a straightforward and illuminating perspective on the question and confirms the view that first emerged from less direct evidence.
机译:对人类和实验动物的记忆障碍的研究对于了解记忆的组织及其细胞和分子底物一直是基础。当发生记忆障碍时,尤其是在神经系统发生紊乱之后,不可避免地会出现这样的问题,即记忆障碍是否反映了信息存储受损或可访问性受损。多年来,该主题一直是大量评论和实验工作的主题。在这次重新评估中,我首先考虑了从1970年代和1980年代进行的行为研究的四个广泛领域,这些领域导致了记忆障碍作为信息存储不足的主流观点。其次,我发现在使用“存储”和“检索”这个术语时会产生一些歧义,尤其是当证据在某种程度上是间接的并且基于行为心理学的分析水平时。然后,我回顾了在这些讨论中被忽视的神经生物学发现。相关研究是有可能监测与行为记忆直接相关的神经元和突触的研究,例如,在具有简单神经系统的动物和行为猴子的单细胞记录中。这项工作为该问题提供了直接而具有启发性的观点,并确认了最初来自较少直接证据的观点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《learning_Memory》 |2006年第5期|p.522-529|共8页
  • 作者

    Larry R. Squire;

  • 作者单位

    Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California 92161, USA;

    Department of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, and Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    debate; nature; memory impairment;

    机译:辩论;性质记忆障碍;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:32:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号