...
首页> 外文期刊>Laboratory Animals >Evaluation of the efficacy of a novel electronic pain assessment device, the Pain Gauge®, for measuring postoperative pain in rats
【24h】

Evaluation of the efficacy of a novel electronic pain assessment device, the Pain Gauge®, for measuring postoperative pain in rats

机译:评估新型电子疼痛评估设备PainGauge®在测量大鼠术后疼痛方面的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

One of the major challenges for individuals working with laboratory animals is the recognition and alleviation of pain. The Pain Gauge® is marketed as a pain assessment device that measures electrodermal activity. To establish whether the Pain Gauge® is effective in assessing postoperative pain in laboratory rats, preoperative and postoperative pain gauge scores ('pain scores') were obtained from 67 rats. Rats were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups (laparotomy, craniotomy or control) and to one of four analgesic groups (meloxicam [2 mg/kg s.c.] or parecoxib [1, 5 or 20 mg/kg i.v.]). Five consecutive 'pain scores' were obtained from each animal at each of five time points (preprocedure, and at 1, 2, 3 and 4 h postoperatively). Overall there was a significant difference between 'pain scores' at different time points; mainly a decrease at 1 h postoperatively compared with the preoperative scores. There was no overall increase in postoperative 'pain scores' in the rats that were most likely to suffer from postoperative pain (rats given a lower dose of analgesic that underwent a surgical procedure) compared with rats that did not undergo a potentially painful procedure (rats in anaesthesia-only/control group). Therefore it was concluded that the Pain Gauge® is ineffective in assessing postoperative pain in rats in this study.
机译:对实验动物个体的主要挑战之一是对疼痛的认识和缓解。 PainGauge®是一种疼痛评估设备,可测量皮肤电活动。为了确定PainGauge®是否有效评估实验大鼠的术后疼痛,从67只大鼠获得了术前和术后的疼痛量表评分(“疼痛评分”)。将大鼠随机分为三个实验组之一(开腹手术,开颅手术或对照组)和四个镇痛组之一(美洛昔康[2 mg / kg s.c.]或帕瑞昔布[1、5或20 mg / kg静脉内])。在五个时间点(术前以及术后1、2、3和4小时)从每只动物获得五个连续的“疼痛评分”。总体而言,在不同时间点的“疼痛评分”之间存在显着差异。与术前评分相比,术后1 h主要下降。与未经历潜在痛苦手术的大鼠(大鼠)相比,最有可能遭受术后疼痛的大鼠(大鼠接受较低剂量的镇痛药并进行了外科手术)的术后“疼痛评分”总体上没有增加在仅麻醉/对照组中)。因此,可以得出结论,该研究中PainGauge®在评估大鼠术后疼痛方面无效。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Laboratory Animals》 |2007年第1期|p.46-54|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Comparative Biology Centre, Medical School, Framlington Place, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK;

    Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada;

    Comparative Biology Centre, Medical School, Framlington Place, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK;

    Comparative Biology Centre, Medical School, Framlington Place, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    PAIN • RAT • ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVITY • AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM • ANALGESIOMETRY;

    机译:疼痛•大鼠•皮层活动性•自主神经系统•麻醉法;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号