首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge Organization >Knowledge Organization for Feminism and Feminist Research:A Discourse Oriented Study of Systematic Outlines, Logical Structure, Semantics and the Process of Indexing
【24h】

Knowledge Organization for Feminism and Feminist Research:A Discourse Oriented Study of Systematic Outlines, Logical Structure, Semantics and the Process of Indexing

机译:女权主义和女权主义研究的知识组织:以话语为导向的系统轮廓,逻辑结构,语义和索引编制过程研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The focus in this article is an analysis of the knowledge organization systems that index and classify feminist research texts in a Swedish bibliographic context. The theoretical and analytical framework is primarily discourse theoretic. At first, a feminist discourse is defined, of which feminist research is seen as a part. Feminist perspectives are analyzed through text analysis of PhD dissertations as feminist articulations. I also analyze the possibilities to classify and index feminist research with the national universal knowledge organization systems (KOS): Svenska Amnesord (SA) and Klassifikationssystem for sven-ska bibliotek (KSB), and one subject specific system: Kvinnohistoriska samlingarnas amnesord (KvA). The systems are analyzed as articulations. The KOS are studied in order to discuss how they are able to articulate feminist perspectives. In the national universal systems, a severe marginahzation of feminist research is noticed. Feminist discourse consisting of feminist theoretical and metatheoretical perspectives are not considered at all in the KOS, which could not be considered as feminist articulations. The marginalization is interpreted as an objectivistic and universalistic epistemology and ontology; monodisciplinary knowledge and thematic topics are privileged. Feminism is misunderstood as a field relating to socio-political women's issues, which has marginalized status in the systems. In the subject-specific system Kvinnohistoriska samlingarnas amnesord incomplete and inadequate knowledge organization is shown. The structure of this index is too simplistic and feminist discourse as such is not defined. Successful organization of feminist knowledge needs to be based on a particular understanding of knowledge and knowledge organization as contextually shaped (and shaping).
机译:本文的重点是对在瑞典书目环境中对女权主义研究文本进行索引和分类的知识组织系统的分析。理论和分析框架主要是话语理论。首先,定义了女权主义话语,女权主义研究被视为其中一部分。通过对博士学位论文作为女权主义话语的文本分析来分析女权主义观点。我还分析了使用国家通用知识组织系统(KOS)对女权主义研究进行分类和索引的可能性:Svenska Amnesord(SA)和sven-ska bibliotek的Klassifikationssystem(KSB),以及一个特定于学科的系统:Kvinnohistoriska samlingarnas amnesord(KvA) 。该系统被分析为清晰度。对KOS进行了研究,以讨论它们如何表达女性主义观点。在国家普遍制度中,注意到女权主义研究严重边缘化。在KOS中根本没有考虑由女性主义理论和元理论观点构成的女性主义话语,因此不能将其视为女性主义的表述。边缘化被解释为一种客观主义和普遍主义的认识论和本体论;一门学科知识和主题是特权。女权主义被误解为与社会政治妇女问题有关的领域,在系统中处于边缘地位。在特定于主题的系统中,Kvinnohistoriska samlingarnas amnesord显示出不完整和不充分的知识组织。该索引的结构过于简单,女性主义话语也未定义。女权主义知识的成功组织需要基于对知识的特定理解,并且知识组织是根据情境塑造的(和塑造的)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Knowledge Organization》 |2010年第1期|p.3-28|共26页
  • 作者

    Jenny Samuelsson;

  • 作者单位

    Umea university, Department of Sociology, 901 87 Umea, Sweden;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:15:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号