...
首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge-Based Systems >A dynamic optimization approach to the design of cooperative co-evolutionary algorithms
【24h】

A dynamic optimization approach to the design of cooperative co-evolutionary algorithms

机译:协同协同进化算法设计的动态优化方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm (CCEA) decomposes a problem into several subcomponents and optimizes them separately. This divide-and-conquer feature endows CCEAs with the capability of distributed and high-efficiency problem solving. However, traditional CCEAs trend to converge to Nash equilibrium rather than the global optimum due to information loss accompanied with problem decomposition. Moreover, the interactive nature makes the subcomponents' landscapes dynamic, which increases the challenge to conduct global optimization. To address these problems, a multi-population mechanism based CCEA (mCCEA) was proposed to compensate information in dynamic landscapes. The mCCEA is decentralized for each subcomponent since it doesn't need centralized archive or information sharing. It focuses on both the global and the local optima of each subcomponent by maintaining multiple populations and conducting local search in dynamic landscapes. These optima are seen as the current representatives of the subcomponents and used by the other subcomponents to construct their complete solutions for fitness evaluation. Experimental study was conducted based on a wide range of benchmark functions. The performance of the proposed algorithm was compared with several peer algorithms from the literature. The experimental results show effectiveness and advantage of the proposed algorithm. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:协同协同进化算法(CCEA)将问题分解为几个子组件,并分别对其进行优化。这种分而治之的功能使CCEA具有分布式和高效解决问题的能力。但是,由于信息丢失和问题分解,传统的CCEA趋向于收敛于Nash均衡而不是全局最优。此外,交互性质使子组件的景观动态变化,这增加了进行全局优化的挑战。为了解决这些问题,提出了一种基于CCEA(mCCEA)的多种群机制来补偿动态景观中的信息。由于mCCEA不需要集中的存档或信息共享,因此它可以分散到每个子组件。它通过保持多个种群并在动态景观中进行局部搜索,着眼于每个子组件的全局和局部最优。这些最优值被视为子组件的当前代表,其他子组件使用它们来构建适合性评估的完整解决方案。根据广泛的基准功能进行了实验研究。将该算法的性能与文献中的几种对等算法进行了比较。实验结果表明了该算法的有效性和优势。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号