首页> 外文期刊>JSAH >Exhibiting the Postmodern: The 1980 Venice Architecture Biennale
【24h】

Exhibiting the Postmodern: The 1980 Venice Architecture Biennale

机译:展览后现代艺术:1980年威尼斯建筑双年展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Few historical investigations have accomplished the dual task of writing the history of a significant postmodern architectural moment while simultaneously unpacking its defining theoretical concepts. Maybe that historical period is still too close to our own. Or perhaps documenting an our-oboric movement such as postmodernism, one that centered on history and the revival of architectural styles, is itself the problem. Among the first books to confront the history of postmodern architecture were Reinhold Martin's Utopia's Ghost, Michael Hays's Architecture‘s Desire, and Emmanuel Petit's Irony; or, The Self-Critical Opacity of Postmodern Architecture. These, however, were more concerned with revisiting themes of postmodern theory than with filling significant historical gaps. In Architecture's Historical Turn: Phenomenology and the Rise of the Postmodern, jorge Otero-Pailos accomplishes the goal of filling such gaps by tackling the postmodern approach toward history and the injection of phenomenology into the discipline of architecture, although his book is unusual in this regard.
机译:很少有历史研究能够完成写重要的后现代建筑历史的同时又要解开其定义理论概念的双重任务。也许那个历史时期仍然离我们自己太近了。或者,记录下以历史和建筑风格复兴为中心的后现代主义等我们厌恶的运动本身就是问题所在。最早面对后现代建筑史的书籍包括莱因霍尔德·马丁(Reinhold Martin)的《乌托邦》(Utopia)的《鬼魂》(Ghost),迈克尔·海斯(Michael Hays)的《建筑的欲望》和伊曼纽尔·佩蒂(Emmanuel Petit)的《反讽》。或者,后现代建筑的自批评不透明性。然而,这些问题更关注的是重新审视后现代理论的主题,而不是填补重大的历史空白。在《建筑学的历史转折:现象学与后现代的兴起》中,jorge Otero-Pailos通过解决后现代对历史的研究以及将现象学注入建筑学来实现填补这种空白的目标,尽管他的书在这方面是不寻常的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《JSAH》 |2018年第3期|356-358|共3页
  • 作者

    ANNMARIE BRENNAN;

  • 作者单位

    University of Melbourne;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 05:06:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号