首页> 外文期刊>JPKE:journal of post keynesian economics >Corporate debt in Latin America and its macroeconomic implications
【24h】

Corporate debt in Latin America and its macroeconomic implications

机译:拉丁美洲的公司债务及其对宏观经济的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article provides an empirical analysis of nonfinancial corporate debt in six large Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru), distinguishing between bond-issuing and nonbond-issuing firms, and assessing the debt's macroeconomic implications. The paper uses a sample of 2,241 firms listed on the stock markets of their respective countries, comprising 34 sectors of economic activity for the period 2009-2016. On the basis of liquidity, leverage, and profitability indicators, it shows that bond-issuing firms are in a worse financial position relative to nonbond-issuing firms. Using Minsky's hedge/speculative/Ponzi taxonomy for financial fragility, we argue that there is a larger share of firms that are in a speculative or Ponzi position relative to the hedge category. Also, the share of hedge bond-issuing firms declines over time. Finally, the article presents the results of estimating a nonlinear threshold econometric model, which demonstrates that beyond a leverage threshold, firms' investment contracts while they increase their liquidity positions. This has important macroeconomic implications since the listed and, in particular, bond-issuing firms (which tend to operate under high leverage levels) represent a significant share of assets and investment. This finding could account, in part, for the retrenchment in investment that the sample of countries included in the paper have experienced in the period under study and highlights the need to incorporate the international bond market in the analyses of monetary transmission mechanisms.
机译:本文对六个拉丁美洲大国(阿根廷,巴西,智利,哥伦比亚,墨西哥和秘鲁)的非金融公司债务进行了实证分析,区分了发债公司和非发债公司,并评估了债务的宏观经济影响。本文使用了在各自国家的股票市场上上市的2,241家公司的样本,包括2009-2016年期间的34个经济活动部门。根据流动性,杠杆和获利能力指标,它表明发行债券的公司相对于非发行债券的公司而言财务状况更差。使用明斯基的对冲/投机/庞氏分类法来分析金融脆弱性,我们认为相对于对冲类别而言,处于投机或庞氏位置的公司份额更大。此外,对冲债券发行公司的份额随时间下降。最后,本文介绍了估算非线性阈值计量经济模型的结果,该模型表明,在超出杠杆阈值的情况下,企业的投资合同会增加其流动性头寸。这具有重要的宏观经济意义,因为上市公司,尤其是发行债券的公司(往往在高杠杆水平下运作)占资产和投资的很大份额。这一发现可以部分解释本文所研究的国家样本在本报告所述期间经历的投资萎缩,并强调了将国际债券市场纳入货币传导机制分析的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号