首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management >Evaluation of Neural Networks for Modeling Nitrate Concentrations in Rivers
【24h】

Evaluation of Neural Networks for Modeling Nitrate Concentrations in Rivers

机译:河流硝酸盐浓度建模的神经网络评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are applied to estimating nitrate concentrations in a typical Midwestern river, i.e., the Upper Sangamon River in Illinois. Throughout the Midwestern United States, nitrate in raw water has recently become an increasingly important problem. This is due to recent changes in the U.S. EPA nitrate standard and to the increasingly widespread use of chemical fertilizers in agriculture. Back-propagation neural networks (BPNNs) and radial basis function neural networks (RBFNNs) are compared as to their effectiveness in water quality modeling. Training of the RBFNNs is much faster than that of the BPNNs, and yields more robust results. These two types of ANNs are compared to traditional regression and mechanistic water quality modeling, based on overall accuracy and on the frequency of false-negative prediction. The RBFNN achieves the best results of all models in terms of overall accuracy, and both BPNN and RBFNN yield the same false-negative frequency, which is better than that of the traditional models. Keywrods neural networks; nitrates; potable water; agricultural watersheds; illinois; river; water pollution
机译:人工神经网络(ANN)用于估算典型的中西部河流(即伊利诺伊州的上加蒙河)中的硝酸盐浓度。在美国中西部地区,原水中的硝酸盐最近已成为一个日益重要的问题。这是由于美国EPA硝酸盐标准的最新变化以及化学肥料在农业中的日益广泛使用。比较了反向传播神经网络(BPNN)和径向基函数神经网络(RBFNN)在水质建模中的有效性。 RBFNN的训练比BPNN的训练快得多,并且产生更可靠的结果。基于总体准确性和假阴性预测的频率,将这两种类型的人工神经网络与传统的回归模型和机械水质模型进行了比较。就整体精度而言,RBFNN达到所有模型的最佳结果,而BPNN和RBFNN产生相同的假阴性频率,这比传统模型要好。 Keywrods神经网络;硝酸盐饮用水;农业流域;伊利诺伊州河;水污染

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号