首页> 外文期刊>Journal of water resource and protection >Reducing Nitrogen Loss in Subsurface Tile Drainage Water with Managed Drainage and Polymer-Coated Urea in a River Bottom Soil
【24h】

Reducing Nitrogen Loss in Subsurface Tile Drainage Water with Managed Drainage and Polymer-Coated Urea in a River Bottom Soil

机译:通过管理性排水和聚合物包膜尿素减少河床底土中地下瓷砖排水中的氮损失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Poorly-drained, river bottom soils can be high corn (Zea mays L.) yielding environments, but saturated soil conditions often reduce corn yields. Wabash soils located in river bottoms in Northeast Missouri have not been traditionally tile drained due to high clay content which requires narrow tile drain spacings. Increased land prices in the region have increased interest in tile draining poorly-drained bottom land soils to increase corn yields which could have a deleterious effect on water quality. The objectives of the three-year study were to determine whether use of managed subsurface drainage (MD) in combination with a controlled release N fertilizer could reduce the annual amount of NO_3~- -N loss through tile drainage water compared to free subsurface drainage (FD) with a non-coated urea application. Annual NO_3~- -N loss through tile drainage water with FD ranged from 28.3 to 90.1 kg·N·ha~(-1). Nitrogen fertilizer source did not affect NO_3~- -N loss through tile drainage water, which was likely due to limited corn uptake over the three-year study due to adverse weather conditions. Averaged over three years, MD reduced tile water drained 52% and NO_3~- -N loss 29% compared to FD. Reduction in NO_3~- -N loss through tile drainage water with MD compared to FD was due to reduced tile flow during the non-cropping period. Annual flow-weighted mean concentration of NO_3~- -N in the tile water was 5.8 mg·N·L~(-1) with FD and 8.1 mg·N·L~(-1) with MD. Tile draining river bottom soils at this location for continuous corn production may not pose a health risk over the evaluated duration.
机译:排水不畅的河床底部土壤可能是高玉米(Zea mays L.)的生产环境,但是饱和的土壤条件通常会降低玉米的产量。传统上,位于密苏里州东北部河床底部的沃巴什土壤由于高粘土含量而需要瓷砖排水空间狭窄,因此传统上并未将瓷砖排水。该地区土地价格的上涨使人们对排水不畅的底层土地土壤的兴趣增加,从而增加了玉米单产,这可能对水质产生不利影响。这项为期三年的研究的目的是确定与自由地下排水相比,管理地下排水(MD)与控释氮肥的组合使用是否可以减少瓷砖排水每年减少的NO_3〜--N损失量( FD)和未涂覆的尿素应用。 FD的瓷砖排水造成的年NO_3〜--N损失为28.3〜90.1 kg·N·ha〜(-1)。氮肥来源不影响瓷砖排水产生的NO_3〜--N损失,这可能是由于在三年研究中由于不利的天气条件限制了玉米的吸收。与FD相比,平均三年来,MD减少的排水量减少了52%,NO_3〜--N损失减少了29%。与FD相比,与FD相比MD减少了瓷砖排水中NO_3〜--N的损失,这是由于在非种植期减少了瓷砖的流量。瓷砖用水中NO_3〜--N的年流量加权平均浓度在FD下为5.8 mg·N·L〜(-1),在MD下为8.1 mg·N·L〜(-1)。在此地点,连续排水的河底土壤瓷砖排水可能不会在评估期间内构成健康风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号