首页> 外文期刊>Journal of testing and evaluation >In Search of Standard Reference Materials for ASTM E05 Fire Standards
【24h】

In Search of Standard Reference Materials for ASTM E05 Fire Standards

机译:寻找符合ASTM E05防火标准的标准参考材料

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The first paragraph of E-691, Standard Practice for Conducting an Inter-laboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method [ASTM E691-05, 2005, "Standard Practice for Conducting an Inter-laboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method," ASTM Book of Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.] states: "Tests performed on presumably identical materials in presumably identical circumstances do not, in general, yield identical results. This is attributed to unavoidable random errors inherent in every test procedure; the factors that may influence the outcome of a test cannot all be completely controlled." Further in the same paragraph the factors are identified: "Many different factors (apart from random variations between supposedly identical specimens) may contribute to the variability in application of a test method, including: a. the operator, b. equipment used, c. calibration of equipment, and d. environment." The primary subjects of both the first and second paragraphs are: "presumably (supposedly) identical materials". If, in fact, "identical materials" were available, one of the variables of testing would be eliminated because the performance of the material would be a known, which could be used for calibration procedures. Thus, any variations in the test results would be caused by a, b, or d. The Holy Grail of ASTM fire standards is the precision and bias section. ASTM regulations require precision statements in all test methods in terms of repeatability and reproducibility. However, most EOS standards do not provide precision and bias data. In fact, only 33% of E05 standards have conducted an inter-laboratory study or round robin at some time. A path forward to promote more systematic calibration procedures for E05 fire test methods and to facilitate more frequent round robin studies, is to explore the identification or development of Standard Reference Materials (SRM's) with defined properties for calibration of ASTM E05 fire tests and to validate operational performance for the same test method conducted at different facilities. Surveys of a wide range of ASTM test standards show that some of them use well-characterized materials to provide specific output data as part of their calibration procedures. In fact, SRM's have been developed for test standards; E162, E648 and E662. This paper summarizes the properties of the materials used for test calibration and their potential use as reference standards or for identifying properties important to formulating a standard material(s) for ASTM E05 fire test methods.
机译:E-691,进行实验室间研究以确定测试方法准确性的标准实践的第一段[ASTM E691-05,2005,进行实验室间研究以确定测试精度的标准实践方法,”宾夕法尼亚州西康斯霍肯市ASTM国际标准协会ASTM标准书指出:“在大概相同的情况下,对可能相同的材料进行的测试通常不会产生相同的结果。这归因于每种方法不可避免的固有误差测试程序;可能影响测试结果的因素无法完全控制。”在同一段落中进一步确定了这些因素:“许多不同的因素(除了假定相同的样本之间的随机变化之外)可能会导致测试方法应用的可变性,包括:a。操作人员,b。使用的设备,c。设备校准和d。环境。”第一段和第二段的主要主题是:“大概(假定)相同的材料”。如果实际上可以使用“相同的材料”,则将消除测试变量之一,因为已知材料的性能,可以将其用于校准程序。因此,测试结果的任何变化将由a,b或d引起。 ASTM防火标准的圣杯是精度和偏差部分。 ASTM法规要求在所有测试方法中就可重复性和可再现性做出精确声明。但是,大多数EOS标准不提供精度和偏差数据。实际上,只有33%的E05标准在某个时间进行了实验室间研究或轮循。寻求促进针对E05防火测试方法的更系统的校准程序并促进更频繁的循环法研究的途径是,探索具有标准特性的标准参考材料(SRM)的鉴定或开发,以对ASTM E05防火测试进行校准并进行验证在不同设施进行的相同测试方法的操作性能。对广泛的ASTM测试标准的调查表明,其中一些使用特性良好的材料作为校准程序的一部分,以提供特定的输出数据。实际上,SRM是为测试标准而开发的。 E162,E648和E662。本文总结了用于测试校准的材料的特性及其作为参考标准或对确定对于ASTM E05耐火测试方法配制标准材料重要的特性的潜在用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号