首页> 外文期刊>Journal of testing and evaluation >Comparison of Isothermal Predictions Based on Model-Free and Model-Based Kinetic Methods
【24h】

Comparison of Isothermal Predictions Based on Model-Free and Model-Based Kinetic Methods

机译:基于无模型和基于模型的动力学方法等温预测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Isothermal predictions based on dynamic measurements do not work correctly for all reactions. This work considers isothermal predictions for model-free and model-based methods for simple reactions and two-step reactions. It is shown that for complex reactions, the model-free analysis based on dynamic measurements always depends on the heating rates of measurements. For this reason, predicted times to a specified degree of conversion are often much longer than true times. Kinetic data from model-free analyses can provide correct isothermal predictions only in cases where the activation energy is either constant or increasing with respect to conversion. If the activation energy decreases with increasing conversion in a model-free analysis, additional isothermal measurements and a correct kinetic model derived from the isothermal measurements are necessary to make correct predictions.
机译:基于动态测量的等温预测不适用于所有反应。这项工作考虑了无模型和基于模型的简单反应和两步反应方法的等温预测。结果表明,对于复杂的反应,基于动态测量的无模型分析始终取决于测量的加热速率。因此,到指定转换率的预测时间通常比真实时间长得多。仅在活化能相对于转化率恒定或增加的情况下,来自无模型分析的动力学数据才能提供正确的等温预测。如果在无模型分析中活化能随转化率的增加而降低,则需要进行额外的等温测量和由等温测量得出的正确动力学模型,以进行正确的预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号