首页> 外文期刊>Journal of testing and evaluation >Comparison Between Destructive and Nondestructive Tests in the Evaluation of Abrasion Resistance of Concrete
【24h】

Comparison Between Destructive and Nondestructive Tests in the Evaluation of Abrasion Resistance of Concrete

机译:混凝土耐磨性评估中破坏性试验与非破坏性试验的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Constant loading and transportation of materials cause abrasive wear in industrial floors.This study compared destructive and nondestructive testing techniques to evaluate the abrasion resistance of concrete. Eight concrete hardeners (six solid and two liquid) were subjected to abrasion, ultrasound, and rebound hammer tests. The results of the trials were compared to identify the concrete hardeners that provide more abrasion strength, and also to determine the relationships between the tests. The results indicated that solid hardeners provide more abrasion resistance than liquid ones and that the abrasion, as a destructive test, and the rebound hammer, as a nondestructive test, show similar results.
机译:材料的持续负载和运输会导致工业地板的磨料磨损。本研究比较了破坏性和非破坏性测试技术来评估混凝土的耐磨性。对八种混凝土固化剂(六种固体和两种液体)进行了磨损,超声和回弹锤测试。比较了试验结果,以确定可提供更高耐磨强度的混凝土硬化剂,并确定试验之间的关系。结果表明,固态硬化剂比液态硬化剂具有更高的耐磨性,作为破坏性试验的磨损和作为非破坏性试验的回弹锤也显示出相似的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号