首页> 外文期刊>Journal of testing and evaluation >Evaluation of Several Sampling Procedures for Spatial Analysis of Natural Turfgrass Sports Field Properties
【24h】

Evaluation of Several Sampling Procedures for Spatial Analysis of Natural Turfgrass Sports Field Properties

机译:天然草皮运动场性质空间分析的几种采样方法的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Spatial analysis of sports field properties are valuable for the development of a site-specific management program. Our objective was to evaluate six sampling grid sizes (2.4 m × 4.8 m, 4.8 m × 4.8 m, 4.8 m × 9.6 m, 9.6 m × 9.6 m, 9.6 m × 19.2 m, and 19.2 m × 19.2 m) for the spatial analysis of volumetric water content (VWC), penetration resistance, and normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) on two football fields (sandy loam and sand capped soils) near field capacity and under drier soil conditions. Descriptive statistics and geostatistical methods (spatial maps and kriging variances) were employed to compare results of the sampling grid sizes. Spatial variations of measured properties between soil moisture conditions were minimal for each sampling grid size; however, the magnitude of VWC and penetration resistance was strongly influenced. Small-scale variability of VWC decreased on maps created from the 9.6 m × 9.6 m sampling grid and greater, but large scale variability was evident with most sampling grids. Small-scale variability of penetration resistance was more noticeable on the native soil field, while comparable maps were observed for all sampling grids between 2.4 m × 4.8 m and 9.6 m × 9.6 m when the field was near field capacity. On the sand capped field, the 19.2 m × 19.2 m sampling grid produced the only incomparable map of penetration resistance, regardless of soil moisture condition. NDVI results were influenced by paint present on each field. It is recommended that sports field managers begin with a 4.8 m × 9.6 m sampling grid to conduct a baseline standard of field properties when soil is near field capacity. Subsequent sampling should be conducted under similar soil moisture conditions with the baseline used for comparison over time. The sampling grid can be adjusted depending on the variability of the field property and desired accuracy.
机译:运动场属性的空间分析对于开发特定于站点的管理程序很有价值。我们的目标是评估空间的六个采样网格大小(2.4 m×4.8 m,4.8 m×4.8 m,4.8 m×9.6 m,9.6 m×9.6 m,9.6 m×19.2 m和19.2 m×19.2 m)对两个足球场(砂壤土和覆有沙的土壤)附近的田间土壤和干燥土壤条件下的体积水含量(VWC),抗渗透性和归一化植被指数(NDVI)进行分析。描述性统计和地统计方法(空间图和克里金法偏差)用于比较采样网格大小的结果。对于每个采样网格大小,在土壤湿度条件之间测得的特性的空间变化最小。但是,VWC的大小和抗穿透性受到很大影响。在由9.6 m×9.6 m采样网格创建的地图上,VWC的小范围可变性有所降低,但更大,但是在大多数采样网格上,大范围可变性是明显的。在原生土壤田间,穿透阻力的小范围变化更为明显,而当田间接近田间容量时,在2.4 m×4.8 m至9.6 m×9.6 m之间的所有采样网格上均观察到可比的图。在沙质覆盖的田地上,无论土壤湿度条件如何,19.2 m×19.2 m的采样网格都产生了唯一无法比拟的抗穿透性图。 NDVI结果受每个领域使用的涂料的影响。建议土壤田间管理者以4.8 m×9.6 m的采样网格开始,以在土壤接近田间容量时进行田间特性的基准标准。随后的采样应在相似的土壤湿度条件下进行,基线用于随时间进行比较。可以根据现场属性的可变性和所需的精度来调整采样网格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号