...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of technology transfer >The effects of biased technological changes on total factor productivity: a rejoinder and new empirical evidence
【24h】

The effects of biased technological changes on total factor productivity: a rejoinder and new empirical evidence

机译:有偏见的技术变革对全要素生产率的影响:重新结合和新的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper by Ji and Wang (J Technol Transf, 2013) calls new attention on the analysis of the effects of the direction of technological change. The aim of this paper is to better articulate and test the theoretical arguments that the direction of technological changes has specific effects on the efficiency of the production process and to study the incentives and the processes that lead to its introduction. The decomposition of total factor productivity growth into the bias and the shift effects enables to articulate the hypothesis that the types of technological change whether more neutral or more biased reflect the variety of the innovation processes at work. The evidence of a large sample of European regions tests the hypothesis that regional innovations systems with a strong science base are better able to introduce neutral technological changes while regional innovation systems that rely more upon learning processes and tacit knowledge favor the introduction of directed technologies a form of meta-substitution that aims at exploiting the opportunities provided by the most intensive use of locally abundant factors.
机译:Ji和Wang的论文(J Technol Transf,2013年)引起了人们对技术变革方向的影响分析的新关注。本文的目的是更好地阐明和检验理论观点,即技术变革的方向对生产过程的效率具有特定影响,并研究导致其引进的诱因和过程。将全要素生产率增长分解为偏见和转移效应,可以阐明以下假设:技术变化的类型,无论是更中性的还是偏见的,都反映了工作中创新过程的多样性。欧洲地区大量样本的证据检验了以下假设:具有强大科学基础的区域创新系统更能够引入中性技术变化,而更多依赖学习过程和隐性知识的区域创新系统则倾向于采用定向技术。元替代,旨在利用最密集利用本地丰富因素提供的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号