首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sustainable Tourism >Adding researchers' behaviour to the research agenda: bridging the science-policy gap in sustainable tourism mobility
【24h】

Adding researchers' behaviour to the research agenda: bridging the science-policy gap in sustainable tourism mobility

机译:将研究人员的行为纳入研究议程:弥合可持续旅游业流动中的科学政策差距

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This opinion piece addresses issues surrounding the role of researchers' behaviour in bridging the science-policy gap in sustainable tourism mobility. Currently, the research agenda on bridging this gap encompasses the development of fuller understanding of the determinants of tourist behaviours, and only a partial understanding of the behaviour of policy-makers and industry. That latter area needs research to identify how those key actors can be encouraged towards developing sustainable tourism mobility. This paper argues that key determinants of researchers' behaviour need to be added to that research agenda. It discusses seven tensions and structures hindering researchers exploring how to mobilise and engage with other industry and policy-makers, including dangers related to the politicisation of science, balancing objectivity and engagement, and the consequences of the current publication culture that characterises the academic community. The discussion concludes with a call for action to researchers to address these tensions and structures. It suggests four ways forward, including informed and skilled engagement with the quality mass media, using proven methods of academic-industry cooperation, workshops to help editors and reviewers to better understand practice-linked, values-driven research issues and the creation of a policy-makers' industry and researchers' action group to encourage joint projects.
机译:这篇观点解决了围绕研究者行为在弥合可持续旅游业流动中的科学政策差距方面的作用问题。当前,关于弥合这一差距的研究议程包括对游客行为决定因素的更全面理解,而对政策制定者和行业行为的部分理解。后一个领域需要进行研究,以确定如何鼓励这些关键角色发展可持续的旅游业流动性。本文认为,研究人员行为的关键决定因素需要添加到该研究议程中。它讨论了阻碍研究人员探索如何动员和与其他行业和政策制定者互动的七种紧张关系和结构,包括与科学政治化,平衡客观性和参与性有关的危险,以及代表学术界的当前出版文化的后果。讨论结束时呼吁采取行动,要求研究人员应对这些紧张关系和结构。它提出了四种前进的方式,包括与优质大众媒体进行知情和熟练的接触,使用行之有效的学术界合作方法,举办研讨会以帮助编辑和审稿人更好地了解与实践相关,以价值为导向的研究问题以及制定政策-制造商行业和研究人员行动小组,以鼓励开展联合项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号