首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sports medicine and physical fitness >Influence of rest duration on muscle activation during submaximal intermittent contractions with the elbow flexor muscles
【24h】

Influence of rest duration on muscle activation during submaximal intermittent contractions with the elbow flexor muscles

机译:休息时间对肘部屈肌次最大间歇性收缩期间肌肉激活的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim. The purpose of the study was to compare the influence of two intervals between consecutive intermittent contractions with the elbow flexors on time to failure and the accompanying changes in electromyographic (EMG) activity and excitation-contraction coupling.rnMethods. Subjects performed 6-s intermittent isometric contractions at 50% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force to task failure in two sessions. The recovery period between consecutive contractions was 4-s (short recovery protocol, SRP) in one and 14-s (long recovery protocol, LRP) in the other session. Results. The number of contractions performed to task failure was greater for the LRP (99±24) compared with the SRP (46±18; P<0.05). The amplitude and duration of the maximal compound action potential (M-wave) did not change during either protocol. EMG activity (% peak MVC) for the elbow flexors and the force fluctuations increased more rapidly during the SRP compared with the LRP (P<0.05) and was greater at task failure for the SRP protocol (P<0.05). These changes were accompanied by a faster decline in twitch force. Conclusion. The results indicate that a briefer interval between consecutive contractions was associated with a more rapid impairment of the excitation-contraction coupling and a faster increase in muscle activation, despite a similar net muscle force for the two protocols.
机译:目标。这项研究的目的是比较连续两次间歇性弯曲与肘屈肌之间的两个间隔对失败时间的影响以及肌电图(EMG)活动和激发-收缩耦合的伴随变化。受试者在两次会议中以最大自愿收缩(MVC)力的50%进行了6秒钟间歇性等距收缩。连续收缩之间的恢复周期在一个会话中为4 s(短恢复协议,SRP),在另一会话中为14 s(长恢复协议,LRP)。结果。与SRP(46±18; P <0.05)相比,LRP对任务失败的收缩次数更大(99±24)。在任一方案中,最大复合动作电位(M波)的幅度和持续时间均未改变。与LRP相比,SRP期间肘屈肌的EMG活性(峰值MVC峰值百分比)和力波动增加更快(P <0.05),而在SRP方案失败时更大(P <0.05)。这些变化伴随着抽搐力的更快下降。结论。结果表明,尽管两个方案的净肌肉力相似,但连续收缩之间的间隔越短,激发收缩耦合越快,肌肉激活越快。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Integrative Physiology University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA ASPIRE, Academy of Sports Excellence, Doha, Qatar;

    Department of Integrative Physiology University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA;

    Department of Integrative Physiology University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA;

    Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0354, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    electromyography; muscle contraction; muscle fatigue; elbow;

    机译:肌电图肌肉收缩肌肉疲劳弯头;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:08:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号