...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of software: evolution and process >An exploratory study of software process improvement implementation risks
【24h】

An exploratory study of software process improvement implementation risks

机译:软件过程改进实施风险的探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Software process improvement (SPI) initiatives have been around for many years, yet many companies are still facing SPI implementation problems. The objective of this exploratory research is to gain an in-depth understanding of risks that can undermine SPI implementation from the perspective of software development practitioners.Interviews were conducted as the main approach of data collection from 34 SPI practitioners. Interviews were recorded and subsequently transcribed. The interview transcripts were systematically scrutinised to identify the major themes for SPI implementation. The identified themes were noted down and compared with the notes made during the interviews to ascertain that the former are indeed a true reflection of the discussion in the interviews. This two-step process also verified that the transcription process had not changed the original data generated in the interviews.Five SPI risks were identified from the interview data: organisational politics, lack of support, lack of defined SPI implementation methodology, lack of awareness and lack of resources that are generally considered critical by Australian practitioners. The results also reveal the similarities and the differences in the risks identified by different group of practitioners (i.e. developers, managers and senior managers), different type of organisations (i.e. small-medium and large) and organisations with mature and immature software development processes. Practitioners identify SPI risks based on previous SPI implementation experience.
机译:软件过程改进(SPI)计划已经存在了很多年,但是许多公司仍面临SPI实现问题。这项探索性研究的目的是从软件开发从业人员的角度深入了解可能破坏SPI实施的风险。访谈是来自34位SPI从业人员的主要数据收集方法。采访记录在案,随后被抄录。对访谈笔录进行了系统地审查,以确定SPI实施的主要主题。将确定的主题记下来,并与访谈中的笔记进行比较,以确定前者确实是访谈中讨论的真实反映。这个分为两步的过程还验证了转录过程没有改变访谈中生成的原始数据。从访谈数据中识别出五个SPI风险:组织政治,缺乏支持,缺乏明确的SPI实施方法,缺乏意识和缺乏澳大利亚从业人员通常认为至关重要的资源。结果还揭示了不同从业者群体(即开发人员,经理和高级经理),不同类型的组织(即中小型和大型)以及具有成熟且不成熟的软件开发流程的组织所确定的风险的异同。从业人员根据以前的SPI实施经验确定SPI风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of software: evolution and process》 |2012年第8期|p.877-894|共18页
  • 作者

    Mahmood Niazi;

  • 作者单位

    School of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK,Department of Information and Computer Science, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia,Department of Software Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    software process improvement; critical risks; exploratory study;

    机译:软件过程改进;重大风险;探索性的研究;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号