首页> 外文期刊>Journal of service management >The road back to relevance: How to put marketing (and marketing scholars) back on the Top Managements' agendas
【24h】

The road back to relevance: How to put marketing (and marketing scholars) back on the Top Managements' agendas

机译:回到相关性之路:如何将营销(和营销学者)重新纳入高层管理人员的议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Based upon primary research, the purpose of this paper is to highlight the three main sources of frustration about the marketing scholars' community current status quo. It delivers feasible solutions and describes, using the example of the Special Issue, how to overcome these challenges and provide the research environment all desire. Design/methodology/approach - Editorial paper summarizing the Special Issue's contributions and observations from the marketing scholar community. Findings - The three main sources of frustration for marketing scholars about the current system are, first, review and publishing processes, second, the dominant epistemological and methodological approach in academe, encouraging an increasing specialization and reliance on generating more and more quantitatively driven knowledge and finally, the lack of acceptance (and outright disdain) for research with a managerial, applied emphasis. Practical implications - But it surely is not mission impossible to build the research environment that is wanted. To build the research environment the community desires and to be "back where we belong," to be relevant means the need to do more than just engaging in lip service. Rather than complying with the system causing frustration, the paper asks all to take an active part in the change process. The paper strongly encourages all, as editors, reviewers, colleagues, mentors and supervisors to do so and take some chances. Engage in and support brave research. Social implications - The authors hope that the paper will stimulate research widely accessible to both managers, and a broader audience. This will eventually lead to a better reputation and public opinion toward marketing scholars and research. Originality/value - Rather than simply stating the main frustrations of the marketing scholar community, and calling for changes, the authors demonstrate how these challenges can be overcome, and deliver platforms to communicate and lead both the conversation and the actions to achieve the research community most desire.
机译:目的-基于初步研究,本文的目的是强调对市场营销学者社区现状感到沮丧的三个主要根源。它提供了可行的解决方案,并以“特刊”为例描述了如何克服这些挑战并提供研究环境所希望的一切。设计/方法/方法-社论文章,总结了特刊对市场学者的贡献和观察。调查结果-市场学者对当前系统感到沮丧的三个主要原因是,首先是审查和发布过程,其次是学术界主要的认识论和方法论方法,这鼓励了专业化的发展和对生成越来越多的定量驱动知识的依赖,以及最后,缺乏对管理性,应用性重点的研究的接受(和完全不屑一顾)。实际意义-但是建立所需的研究环境当然并非没有使命。建立社区所希望的研究环境并“回到我们的归属地”,要具有相关性,就意味着需要做更多的工作,而不仅仅是从事口头服务。白皮书要求所有人积极参与变更过程,而不是遵守导致沮丧的系统。该论文强烈鼓励所有人,包括编辑,审稿人,同事,导师和主管们,并借此机会。参与并支持勇敢的研究。社会影响-作者希望该论文能激发研究人员和管理人员以及更广泛的受众广泛使用。这最终将为市场营销学者和研究带来更好的声誉和公众舆论。原创性/价值-作者不仅展示了营销学者社区的主要挫败感并呼吁进行变革,还展示了如何克服这些挑战,并提供了交流平台,以进行交流并引导对话和行动,以实现研究社区最渴望的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号