首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the royal Asiatic society >State Correspondence in the Ancient World: From New Kingdom Egypt to the Roman Empire
【24h】

State Correspondence in the Ancient World: From New Kingdom Egypt to the Roman Empire

机译:古代世界中的国家通信:从新王国埃及到罗马帝国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This remarkable volume sets out to present the evidence and characteristics of some of the most important corpuses of material to be preserved in manuscript tradition or to have been recovered by archaeology, the royal and imperial correspondences of the great empires of antiquity. The focus is on empires rather than smaller states, a coherent approach which serves well to highlight both similarities and differences among the different administrative systems as well as to put systematic developments in historical perspective. The parameters are set out by Karen Radner in her introductory chapter "Long Distance Communication and the Cohesion of Early Empires". The empires included are the Egyptian New Kingdom and the Hittite, Assyrian, Neo-Babylonian, Achaemenid, Hellenistic and Roman empires. The range of languages covered by this spread - Egyptian, Hittite, Luwian, Akkadian (Assyrian and Babylonian), Aramaic, Elamite, Latin and Greek - is impressive enough and hand in hand with this the range of materials on which these texts were recorded is also varied, comprising clay tablets, wooden writing boards, papyrus, leather and stone. The span has its origins in research on royal correspondence of the Assyrian empire from the earlier part of the first millennium bce, so that the cases studied frame this neatly from a chronological perspective. Explicitly not dealt with are, for example, the correspondence of the Ur Ⅲ empire and the myriad letters from the palace bureaucracies of the Old Babylonian period. Although to some degree understandable - the Old Babylonian material in particular is perhaps just too vast - the omission does mean the work does not give quite the complete story. That is however a small point. The work succeeds in achieving its ambition brilliantly. Turning to the specific studies, Jana Mynarova starts with a contribution on "Egyptian State Correspondence in the New Kingdom: The Letters of the Levantine Client Kings in the Amarna Correspondence and Contemporary Evidence". The Amarna correspondence is the record of communications of the Pharaoh both with independent states (the great powers Hattusa, Mittanni, Assyria and Babylonia; also Alashiya and Arzawa) and with the Egyptian client states along the Levant. Only one other New Kingdom royal letter is known, a missive written in hieratic and preserved in two copies on papyrus from the site of Merwer in the southern Fayyum. Mynarova reviews the participants in these exchanges along with associated chancellery practices; the results of the analysis of the clay of the actual tablets are also introduced.
机译:这本引人注目的书着重介绍了一些最重要的材料语料库的证据和特征,这些材料语料是保存在手稿传统中或已通过考古,古代大帝国的皇室和帝国书信加以恢复的。重点是帝国而不是较小的国家,这是一种连贯的方法,可以很好地突出显示不同行政系统之间的异同,并可以从历史的角度看待系统的发展。这些参数由Karen Radner在她的介绍性章节“长距离通信和早期帝国的凝聚力”中设定。包括的帝国是埃及新王国和赫梯,亚述,新巴比伦,阿契美尼德,希腊化和罗马帝国。这种传播所涵盖的语言范围-埃及语,赫梯语,卢维安语,阿卡德语(亚述人和巴比伦语),阿拉姆语,埃拉姆语,拉丁语和希腊语-足够令人印象深刻,与此相关的是记录这些文字的材料范围也有变化,包括粘土片,木制书写板,纸莎草纸,皮革和石材。跨度起源于公元前一千年早期对亚述帝国王室往来的研究,因此从时间顺序上看,这些案例很好地构成了这一框架。例如,没有明确处理的是UrⅢ帝国的信件和旧巴比伦时期宫殿官僚机构的无数信件。尽管在某种程度上可以理解-特别是旧巴比伦的材料可能太丰富了-的遗漏确实意味着作品并没有提供完整的故事。但是,这只是一个小问题。这项工作成功地实现了它的雄心壮志。转向具体研究,Jana Mynarova首先对“新王国中的埃及国家往来信件:阿凡纳信件和当代证据中黎凡特客户国王的来信”发表了贡献。 Amarna信件是法老与独立国家(哈图萨,米坦尼,亚述和巴比伦的大国;还有阿拉希亚和阿尔扎瓦)以及与黎凡特沿岸的埃及客户国家进行通讯的记录。仅有的另一封新王国皇家信件是已知的,这封信是用文字写成的,并保存在法尤姆南部Merwer遗址的纸莎草纸上,一式两份。米纳洛娃(Mynarova)审查了这些交流的参与者以及相关的总理府做法;还介绍了实际片剂的粘土分析结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号