首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the royal Asiatic society >Classical Confucian Political Thought: A New Interpretation
【24h】

Classical Confucian Political Thought: A New Interpretation

机译:儒家古典政治思想的新解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this book, Professor El Amine argues for a division between Confucian ethical and political thought, going back to the very earliest writings on the subject: the Lunyu 論語 (Analects of Confucius), Mengzi 孟子 (Mencius), and Xunzi 荀子. Chapter One discusses the concept of virtue (de 德), arguing that early Confucian philosophers saw a very limited potential for people other than the ruling elite to acquire this key quality. Chapters Two and Three consider the mechanisms which early texts considered necessary for ensuring social stability and harmony, while Chapter Four describes the roles ascribed to government ministers. Finally, Chapter Five is concerned with the duty of the individual with respect to the state, particularly in terms of government service, and Chapter Six concludes with an account of the Confucian conception of tian 天 (Heaven), which validates their vision of an orderly society. The most successful part of Classical Confucian Political Thought is its discussion of English language scholarship on early Confucian thought in the last fifty years-this is thorough and comprehensive, and references the work of many of the most important scholars in the field, with a useful consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of their arguments. The remainder of the book is more problematic. In spite of the account of the historical background given in the Prologue, the subsequent handling of the main texts is unsophisticated and lacking in contextualisation. Since the Confucian texts under consideration are thought to be the products of different times and places, it is not appropriate to treat them as if the governments and political systems under discussion are as one. Of equal concern is the author's failure to even mention the developments which occurred during the Han dynasty. Prior to the first century BCE, Confucian scholars were at best limited to the lower levels of the bureaucracy, hence early Confucian political thought predating this period should be understood as Utopian. The cataclysmic political upheavals which took place in the reign of Han Wudi (r. 140-87 BCE) resulted in a situation where Confucian scholars were promoted to the highest level of officialdom, whereupon their attempts to introduce Confucian policies frequently met with predictably disastrous results. By eliding these two stages in the history of early Confucian thought, the author does her arguments no service.
机译:在这本书中,埃尔·阿明(El Amine)教授主张将儒家的伦理思想与政治思想区分开,可追溯到有关该主题的最早著作:《论语》,《孟子孟子》和《 zi子》。第一章讨论了德性的概念,认为早期的儒家哲学家认为,除了统治精英以外,其他人获得这一关键素质的潜力非常有限。第二章和第三章讨论了早期文本认为对确保社会稳定与和谐必不可少的机制,而第四章则描述了赋予政府部长的作用。最后,第五章关注个人在国家方面的责任,特别是在政府服务方面。第六章以儒家的天(天)概念作为结语,这证实了他们对有序秩序的看法。社会。古典儒家政治思想最成功的部分是它对近五十年来早期儒家思想的英语学术研究-这是全面而全面的,并参考了该领域许多最重要学者的著作,并提供了有益的帮助。考虑他们论据的优缺点。本书的其余部分更有问题。尽管在序言中提到了历史背景,但随后对主要文本的处理却并不复杂,也缺乏语境化。由于所审议的儒家文本被认为是不同时期和不同地方的产物,因此不宜将它们视为所讨论的政府和政治体系是一体的。同样令人关切的是,作者甚至没有提到汉朝时期的事态发展。在公元前一世纪之前,儒家学者充其量只限于官僚机构的下层,因此,在此之前的早期儒家政治思想应被理解为乌托邦。汉武帝统治时期(公元前140-87年)发生的灾难性政治动荡导致儒家学者被提升为最高官僚阶层,因此他们推行儒家政策的尝试常常遭到可预见的灾难性结果。通过删掉儒家早期思想史的两个阶段,作者毫无根据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号