首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the royal Asiatic society >Writing Self, Writing Empire: Chandar Bhan Brahman and the Cultural World of the Indo-Persian State Secretary
【24h】

Writing Self, Writing Empire: Chandar Bhan Brahman and the Cultural World of the Indo-Persian State Secretary

机译:写作自我,写作帝国:Chandar Bhan Brahman和印度波斯国务卿的文化世界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Over the past decade or so there have been major steps forward in our understanding of Mughal history. Among them were: Ruby Lai's Domesticity and Power in the Early Mughal World (Cambridge, 2005), which demonstrates that the women of the Mughal royal family, although confined to the women's quarters were nevertheless major players in the family business of imperial rule; Munis Faruqui's The Princes of the Mughal Empire, 1500-1719 (Cambridge, 2012), which argues that the rebellions and internecine wars of succession, which were such a prominent feature of Mughal rule, far from being a source of weakness which historians supposed them to be, were actually a means by which Mughal rule was spread and deepened through widespread networks of friends and allies; Evrim Binbas's Intellectual Networks in Timurid Iran: Sharaf al-Din Yazdi and the Islamicate Republic of Letters (Cambridge, 2016), which shows how important an understanding of the Timurid past may be, in particular its political ideas, for understanding the practice of Mughal sovereignty; and Azfar Moin's Millennial Sovereign: Sacred Kingship and Sainthood in Islam (New York, 2012), which, although written a little before Binbas's book, has demonstrated how these Timurid ideas came to be realised in a fruitful intermingling of dynastic culture and shrine-based Sufism under the Mughals. To these we should add Muzaffar Alam's The Languages of Political Islam (Delhi, 2005), which shows how rulers and institutions adapted themselves to a variety of Indian contexts over 600 years and became deeply Indianised. Such interventions have brought much that is fresh to Mughal history. Rajeev Kinra is a pupil of Muzaffar Alam. His Writing Self, Writing Empire is another intervention, which turns much conventional historiography on its head. His focus is Chandar Bhan Brahman (c. 1600-c. 1666/70), a Punjabi Hindu who held high office under Jahangir and Shah Jahan and in retirement as the administrator of the Taj Mahal corresponded regularly with Aurangzeb. He was one of the great prose stylists of his time which is one of the reasons why his memoir of life at the Mughal court, Chahar Chaman (Four Gardens) and his separate collection of personal letters, often known as Munsha' at-i Brahman, have come down to us in numerous manuscripts. Kinra uses these documents as the prime focus both of his explanation of the culture of Mughal governance, broadly construed, and of an assessment of emerging strands of 'modernity'.
机译:在过去的十年左右的时间里,我们对莫卧儿历史的理解迈出了重要的一步。其中包括:赖丽红的《莫卧儿帝国早期世界中的家庭与权力》(剑桥,2005年),这表明莫卧儿王室的妇女虽然局限于妇女的住所,但在帝国统治的家族企业中仍是主要角色;穆尼斯·法鲁基(Munis Faruqui)的《莫卧儿帝国王子》(1500-1719)(剑桥,2012年)认为,叛乱和相互之间的继承战争是莫卧儿统治的重要特征,而远非历史学家认为的弱点实际上,这是莫卧儿统治通过广泛的朋友和盟友网络传播和加深的手段;伊夫里姆·宾巴斯(Evrim Binbas)在伊朗帖木儿(Timurid)的知识网络:沙拉夫·丁·亚兹迪(Sharaf al-Din Yazdi)和伊斯兰信民共和国(剑桥,2016年),这表明了解帖木律的过去,特别是其政治思想,对于理解莫卧儿的作法可能非常重要。主权;阿兹法尔·穆恩(Azfar Moin)的《千禧世代君主制:伊斯兰教中的神圣王权和圣贤》(纽约,2012年)虽然在宾巴斯的书之前写过一点,但也证明了这些帖木儿思想是如何在朝代文化和基于神社的卓有成效的融合中实现的苏菲主义在穆加尔人的统治下。除此以外,我们还应该加上穆扎法尔·阿拉姆(Muzaffar Alam)的《政治伊斯兰语言》(德里,2005年),该书显示了统治者和机构如何在600多年的时间里适应各种印度环境,并深深地被印度化。这种干预为莫卧儿历史带来了很多新鲜的东西。 Rajeev Kinra是Muzaffar Alam的学生。他的《写作自我,写作帝国》是另一种干预手段,这使许多传统的史学陷入了困境。他的工作重点是Chandar Bhan Brahman(约1600-c。1666/70),是旁遮普邦的印度教徒,在Jahangir和Shah Jahan的领导下担任高级职务,并在退休时担任泰姬陵的管理者定期与Aurangzeb通讯。他是当时最伟大的散文设计师之一,这也是他在莫卧儿宫的生活回忆录Chahar Chaman(四个花园)和他的私人信件(通常被称为Munsha'at-i Brahman)分开收集的原因之一,在众多手稿中都归结于我们。 Kinra将这些文件作为他对Mughal治理文化的解释(主要解释)以及对新兴的“现代性”评估的主要重点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号