首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the royal Asiatic society >A Subtle Difference: On Ending One's Own Life in Muslim Religious Thought
【24h】

A Subtle Difference: On Ending One's Own Life in Muslim Religious Thought

机译:细微的差别:在穆斯林宗教思想中终结自己的生命

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the focus of this article is the complex problem to validate the deliberate disposal of a Muslim's own life for an Islamically sustained cause - popular modus operandi in the contemporary religiously inspired militant contexts - from a range of religious perspectives. While the general tenor suggest that such an action constitutes deliberate suicide (qatl nafsah) and is to be firmly rejected, the eschatological concept of 'martyrdom' (istishhad) adds an alternative interpretation that allows for a positive and even commendable appraisal of such an act. It is shown here that, from the formative period of Islam onwards, Muslim exegetes, theologians, jurists and philosophers have struggled to come to some kind of agreement over what delineates 'suicide' from 'martyrdom'. Underlying all those attempts is the question what constitutes 'life': it appears that the substantial differences in the appraisal of a Muslim's disposal of her or his own life are, in fact, rooted in different conceptions of 'life' itself. It is shown how the dismissal of such acts as 'suicide' or endorsement as 'martyrdom' was, and is, sustained by complex theological and philosophical arguments, including those of volition versus predetermination, as well as such on vegetative growth versus the eudemonistic 'good life'. Depending on which view is being adopted, one and the same act of disposing one's own life can either be consistently denounced as religiously reprehensible, or equally consistently as religiously commendable.
机译:本文的重点是一个复杂的问题,它需要从多种宗教角度验证穆斯林为伊斯兰教的可持续事业(在当代受到宗教启发的好战分子环境下的通俗手法)的故意处置。虽然总督认为这种行为构成蓄意自杀(qatl nafsah),并应予以坚决拒绝,但末世论的“ mart难”(istishhad)概念增加了另一种解释,可以对这种行为进行积极甚至值得称赞的评价。 。从这里可以看出,从伊斯兰教的形成时期开始,穆斯林的种姓,神学家,法学家和哲学家就关于“自杀”与“ mart难”的划界一直难以达成某种共识。所有这些尝试背后的问题是什么构成“生命”:在对穆斯林处置自己或自己的生命的评估中,实质性差异实际上根源于“生命”本身的不同概念。研究表明,驳斥“自杀”或背书为“ acts难”的行为是如何并通过复杂的神学和哲学论证而得以维持的,包括意志力与预定论以及植物生长与举止论等。美好生活'。取决于采用哪种观点,可以一视同仁地谴责一个人或自己的生活,这在宗教上应受到谴责,在宗教上也应受到同样的表扬。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号