首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >A cross-cultural comparison of road traffic risk perceptions,attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour
【24h】

A cross-cultural comparison of road traffic risk perceptions,attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour

机译:道路交通风险认知,对交通安全态度和驾​​驶员行为的跨文化比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present study investigated cross-cultural differences in road traffic risk perception, risk sensitivity and risk willingness in Norway, Russia, India, Ghana, Tanzania and Uganda. Differences in driver attitudes and driver behaviour were also examined. An additional aim was to test whether the risk constructs and driver attitudes explained the variation in risky driver behaviour in these countries. To obtain these aims, a questionnaire survey was conducted among a randomly obtained representative sample of the Norwegian public (n = 247). Stratified samples were established in Russia (« = 245), India (n = 196), Ghana (n = 299), Tanzania (n = 559) and Uganda (n = 415). The respondents completed a questionnaire which consisted of validated self-reported measures of the risk constructs, and driver attitudes and behaviour. Norwegians reported safer attitudes regarding drinking and driving, and speeding in road traffic. These respondents also reported more seat belt use and lower frequencies of drinking and driving than the remaining subsamples. Respondents from Sub-Saharan Africa reported higher road traffic risk perceptions and risk sensitivity than respondents from Norway, Russia and India. Respondents from Tanzania reported the highest willingness to take risks both in traffic and in general. Participants from Sub-Saharan Africa and India reported safer attitudes in regard to speaking out to an unsafe driver, rule violations and sanctions, attitudes towards pedestrians, and traffic rules and knowledge. Respondents from Sub-Saharan Africa also reported more precautious behaviour and less speeding. The predictive model of driver behaviour explained a satisfactory amount of variance in Norway, Russia and India, but was poorly fitted in the African countries. The results are discussed in line with the general risk environments and the road traffic systems in high- and low-income countries. Challenges related to measuring road traffic attitudes and behaviour in low-income countries are also discussed.
机译:本研究调查了挪威,俄罗斯,印度,加纳,坦桑尼亚和乌干达在道路交通风险感知,风险敏感性和风险意愿方面的跨文化差异。还检查了驾驶员态度和驾驶员行为的差异。另一个目的是测试风险构成和驾驶员态度是否可以解释这些国家中危险驾驶员行为的变化。为了实现这些目标,对随机获得的挪威公众代表性样本(n = 247)进行了问卷调查。在俄罗斯(«= 245),印度(n = 196),加纳(n = 299),坦桑尼亚(n = 559)和乌干达(n = 415)建立了分层样本。受访者填写了一份调查问卷,其中包括经过验证的自我报告的风险构成测度,驾驶员态度和行为。挪威人报告了在酒后驾驶,道路交通超速方面的安全态度。这些受访者还报告说,与其余子样本相比,更多地使用了安全带,并且饮酒和驾驶的频率更低。与来自挪威,俄罗斯和印度的受访者相比,来自撒哈拉以南非洲地区的受访者对道路交通风险的感知和风险敏感性更高。来自坦桑尼亚的受访者表示,无论是在交通还是总体上,他们承担风险的意愿最高。撒哈拉以南非洲和印度的参与者报告说,在向不安全驾驶者说话,违反规则和制裁,对行人的态度以及交通规则和知识方面,态度较为安全。撒哈拉以南非洲地区的受访者还报告说,他们的行为更加谨慎,行车速度也较慢。驾驶员行为的预测模型在挪威,俄罗斯和印度解释了令人满意的差异量,但在非洲国家中却不太适用。根据高风险和低收入国家的一般风险环境和道路交通系统对结果进行了讨论。还讨论了与测量低收入国家道路交通态度和行为有关的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号