首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research in science teaching >Representations of nature of science in U.S. science standards: A historical account with contemporary implications
【24h】

Representations of nature of science in U.S. science standards: A historical account with contemporary implications

机译:美国科学标准中自然科学的表征:具有当代意义的历史记载

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study evaluated the representations of nature of science (NOS) in U.S. state science standards, and examined the changes in these representations from documents advanced in the 1980s through 2016. Drawing from the consensus perspective on NOS and prior studies focusing on the analysis of textual content, documents were inspected for 10 target NOS aspects: the empirical, tentative, inferential, creative, theory-driven, and social NOS, in addition to the myth of "The Scientific Method," the nature of scientific theories and laws, and the social and cultural embeddedness of science. Ninety-eight state documents from 48 states were analyzed and multiple editions were collected from 34 states. Additionally, relevant materials from the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) were assessed for their coverage of the same NOS aspects. Collected materials were scored as whole documents, including over 11,000 pages of text in total, on each target aspect, which reflected the treatment (naive vs. informed) of NOS in text and the manner of presentation (explicit vs. implicit). Overall, surprisingly, state standards documents have improved very little with respect to their NOS coverage over the last 30years. NOS standards documents remain silent on a majority of key aspects of NOS, and the number of aspects showing explicit, informed representations has held constant. The NGSS performed well compared to many contemporary documents, but they failed to address all target NOS aspects in a desirable manner. Further analysis raised concerns with the degree that states fully adopt and disseminate standards in manner consistent with the NGSS despite stated intentions, which may negatively impact NOS coverage in instructional resources and classroom enactments. To improve NOS representations in standards, recognizing the role these documents play in shaping instructional materials and teaching in the science classroom, exemplars from analyzed materials were highlighted with informed and explicit representations of multiple aspects.
机译:这项研究评估了美国州科学标准中自然科学(NOS)的表示形式,并从1980年代到2016年提交的文献中研究了这些表示形式的变化。从对NOS的共识观点出发,并着重于对文本的分析的先前研究。除了“科学方法”的神话,科学理论和法律的本质以及科学的社会和文化嵌入。分析了来自48个州的98个州文档,并从34个州收集了多个版本。另外,评估了来自下一代科学标准(NGSS)的相关材料对相同NOS方面的覆盖。对收集到的材料进行整体评分,包括在每个目标方面的总计超过11,000页的文本,这反映了文本中NOS的处理方式(幼稚还是知情)和表示方式(显式还是隐含)。总体而言,令人惊讶的是,在过去30年中,州标准文档在NOS覆盖率方面几乎没有改善。 NOS标准文件对NOS的大多数关键方面保持沉默,并且显示明确,有根据的表示形式的方面数量保持不变。与许多现代文献相比,NGSS表现良好,但是它们未能以理想的方式解决所有目标NOS方面的问题。进一步的分析引起了人们的关注,即尽管有明确的意图,各州仍以与NGSS一致的方式完全采用和传播标准,这可能会对NOS在教学资源和课堂法规方面的覆盖率产生负面影响。为了提高标准中的NOS表示形式,认识到这些文件在塑造教学材料和在科学课堂中发挥作用,对分析材料的示例进行了强调,并以多方面的明示表示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号