首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Political Ideologies >The triumph of what (if anything)? Rethinking political ideologies and political institutions in twentieth-century Europe
【24h】

The triumph of what (if anything)? Rethinking political ideologies and political institutions in twentieth-century Europe

机译:什么(如果有)的胜利?重新思考二十世纪欧洲的政治思想和政治制度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This note explores new ways of thinking about the history of political thought in twentieth-century Europe. It argues that more attention ought to be paid to the interaction between political thought or imagination on the one hand and, on the other, actual political institutions as they were designed, sometimes destroyed, an often re-designed in the course of twentieth-century European history. With this comes a clearer focus on 'in-between figures' (such as public lawyers). The note then outlines an argument concerning the emergence—even triumph—of a particular set of institutions and normative ideas (or sometimes just intuitions) in Western Europe after 1945, a set that was largely extended to Southern as well as Eastern Europe towards the end of the century. What is summed up as a conception of constrained civilian democratic administrative statehood did not reflect any traditional 'ism' and constituted a genuinely new ideological configuration. Have you forgotten the other bankruptcies? What was Christianity doing in the various catastrophes of society? What became of Liberalism? What has Conservatism produced, in either its enlightened or its reactionary form? … If we are indeed honestly to weigh out the bankruptcies of ideology, we shall have a long task ahead of us. Victor Serge Democracy has developed wherever the abstract appeal of the ideologue and the concrete experimentation of the practical man have worked together. A. D. Lindsay
机译:本说明探讨了二十世纪欧洲政治思想史的新思维方式。它认为,一方面应更多地注意政治思想或想象力之间的相互作用,另一方面,应在二十世纪的过程中设计,有时摧毁,经常重新设计实际的政治机构,以进行互动。欧洲历史。随之而来的是更加明确地关注“中间人物”(例如公共律师)。然后,这份说明概述了一种论点,涉及1945年后西欧出现的一套特定的制度和规范思想(有时甚至是直觉),甚至取得了胜利,这一制度在很大程度上一直延伸到南欧和东欧。世纪。概括为受限制的平民民主行政国家的概念并没有反映任何传统的“主义”,而是构成了一种全新的意识形态结构。你忘了其他破产吗?基督教在社会的各种灾难中正在做什么?自由主义变成了什么?保守主义以启蒙或反动的形式产生了什么? ……如果我们确实诚实地权衡意识形态的破产,那么我们将面临漫长的任务。无论思想家的抽象诉求与实践者的具体试验如何协同工作,维克托·塞格民主运动都得到了发展。 A.D.林赛

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Political Ideologies》 |2009年第2期|211-226|共16页
  • 作者

    Jan-Werner Mller;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Politics, Corwin Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号