首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >Mark Jopling v (1) Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC (2) Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Quantum Teddington LLP
【24h】

Mark Jopling v (1) Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC (2) Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Quantum Teddington LLP

机译:马克·乔普林诉(1)泰晤士河畔里士满LBC(2)住房,社区和地方政府国务卿兼量子泰丁顿律师事务所

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC ("the Council") included the proposed designation of a site known as "Udney Park Playing Fields" ("the Site") as Local Green Space within their draft Local Plan. The designation was made following an application to designate the Site as Local Green Space was made by the Claimant. During the examination of the local plan, the Inspector proposed a number of main modifications. The Inspector rejected the proposed designation of the Site as Local Green Space and the Council went on to adopt the plan with the modifications recommended by the Inspector. However, the Claimant alleged that the procedure was flawed for three reasons: (1) The main modifications as proposed by the Inspector and later circulated for consultation by the Council, did not make clear that they included the de-designation of the Site. Those in favour of retaining the designation were therefore not provided with an opportunity to make representations.
机译:泰晤士河畔里士满LBC(“理事会”)在其本地计划草案中提议将一个被称为“ Udney Park运动场”(“站点”)的地点指定为本地绿地。指定是在索赔人提出申请将站点指定为“本地绿色空间”之后进行的。在审查地方计划时,检查专员提出了一些主要修改意见。检查员拒绝了将站点指定为“本地绿色空间”的提议,理事会随后通过了检查员建议的修改方案。但是,索赔人称,该程序存在缺陷,原因有以下三个:(1)检查专员提出的主要修改,后来分发给理事会征求意见,但并未明确指出其中包括取消指定工地。因此,那些不愿保留该名称的人没有机会进行陈述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号