首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology >COMPARISON BETWEEN EQUILIBRIUM CYCLE AND SUCCESSIVE MULTICYCLE OPTIMIZATION METHODS FOR IN-CORE FUEL MANAGEMENT OF PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS
【24h】

COMPARISON BETWEEN EQUILIBRIUM CYCLE AND SUCCESSIVE MULTICYCLE OPTIMIZATION METHODS FOR IN-CORE FUEL MANAGEMENT OF PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS

机译:加压水反应器内部燃料管理的平衡循环与成功多循环优化方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Analyses of an equilibrium cycle are useful for evaluating newly designed fuels, defining an envelope of core operating parameters, and so on. However; generation of a loading pattern for the equilibrium cycle is much more difficult than that of a single cycle. Therefore, a loading pattern optimization code for the equilibrium cycle of pressurized water reactors, OPAL, has been newly developed on the basis of the simulated annealing method. In order to verify the capability of the OPAL code; comparison with successive multicycle optimizations was performed while fixing the number of fresh fuel in each cycle. Through benchmark calculations, it was found that the result of the equilibrium cycle optimization was almost compatible with that of the successive multicycle optimization, when the definition of each objective function was similar. However successive multicycle optimization includes some ambiguity due to limits on the number of calculated cycles, since it requires much computation time. Consequently, the equilibrium cycle optimization has advantages including the quantitative comparison of the core neutronic performances. [References: 18]
机译:平衡循环的分析对于评估新设计的燃料,定义核心运行参数的范围等很有用。然而;平衡循环载荷模式的产生比单个循环困难得多。因此,在模拟退火方法的基础上,新开发了用于压水堆平衡循环的装载模式优化代码OPAL。为了验证OPAL代码的能力;在确定每个循环中的新鲜燃料数量的同时,进行了与连续多循环优化的比较。通过基准计算,发现当每个目标函数的定义相似时,平衡循环优化的结果与后续多循环优化的结果几乎兼容。但是,由于计算周期数的限制,连续的多周期优化存在一些歧义,因为它需要大量的计算时间。因此,平衡循环优化具有包括对核心中子性能进行定量比较的优势。 [参考:18]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号