首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development >Language Rights In Historical And Contemporary Perspective
【24h】

Language Rights In Historical And Contemporary Perspective

机译:历史和当代视野中的语言权利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a reconceptualisation of language rights, drawing on historical sources and contemporary practice. It shows that early advocates of rights saw these as limits on the state's ability to deprive citizens of basic liberties. Only later did the concept come to include the requirement that the state be proactive in providing selected groups with specific assistance, including in areas such as language use and language education. The paper challenges the view that language rights constitute entitlements based in moral imperatives, to be provided by a proactive state regardless of cost. It further argues against the very concept of language rights by suggesting that language-related assistance is qualitatively equivalent to other aspects of social policy aiming at promoting the public good through systematic evaluation of costs and benefits. From this perspective, 'rights' are in fact claims on public resources, to be negotiated along with all other claims. While the pursuit of language rights often stems from moral outrage in the face of exclusion and inequity, exclusive reliance on morality at the expense of systematic assessment of costs and benefits risks making current conceptualisations of language rights irrelevant to policymakers.
机译:本文利用历史渊源和当代实践,对语言权利进行了重新概念化。它表明,早期的权利倡导者将这些视为限制国家剥夺公民基本自由的能力。直到后来,该概念才包括要求国家积极向选定的群体提供特定帮助的要求,包括在语言使用和语言教育等领域。本文对以下观点提出了质疑,即语言权利构成了基于道德义务的权利,应由一个积极主动的国家提供,而与成本无关。它进一步暗示了语言权利这一概念,认为与语言有关的援助在质量上等同于旨在通过系统地评估成本和收益来促进公共利益的社会政策的其他方面。从这个角度来看,“权利”实际上是对公共资源的主张,将与所有其他主张一起进行谈判。尽管语言权利的追求通常源于面对排斥和不平等时的道德暴行,但完全依赖道德却以对成本和收益的系统评估为代价,这使得当前的语言权利概念与政策制定者无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号