首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Monetary Economics >Public education reform: Community or national funding of education?
【24h】

Public education reform: Community or national funding of education?

机译:公共教育改革:社区还是国家的教育经费?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I use a political economy model of public funding of education to evaluate the welfare implications of a move from a community- to a nation-wide funding policy. Broadening the scope of education finance has intragenerational redistribution effects as well as intergenera-tional effects. Previous studies have emphasized the intragenerational redistribution effects of moving from local to state-financed systems, while holding factor prices fixed. The model in this paper includes a social security system and allows factor prices to vary endogenously. I examine the welfare effects of broadening the scope of financing from a community- to a nation-wide system and find that there are very large welfare gains as voters "internalize" the effect of the education policy on both factor prices and social security benefits. I also focus on the intergenerational distributional effects, finding that significant welfare gains occur despite the displacement of the median voter to an older agent that cares less about children's well-being.
机译:我使用公共教育经费的政治经济学模型来评估从社区到全国的资助政策对福利的影响。扩大教育财政的范围既有代际再分配效应,又有代际效应。先前的研究强调了在保持要素价格不变的情况下,从地方政府向国家资助的系统转变的代内再分配效应。本文中的模型包括社会保障系统,并允许要素价格内生地变化。我研究了将融资范围从社区范围扩展到全国范围的制度所带来的福利影响,发现随着选民“内在化”教育政策对要素价格和社会保障福利的影响,福利收益非常可观。我还关注代际分配的影响,发现尽管中位选民转移到了对子女福祉的关心较少的老年经纪人手中,但仍取得了显着的福利收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号