首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managerial psychology >The self-rater's personality and self-other disagreement in multi-source performance ratings: Is disagreement healthy?
【24h】

The self-rater's personality and self-other disagreement in multi-source performance ratings: Is disagreement healthy?

机译:自我评估者的人格和多源绩效评估中的自我-其他异议:异议是否健康?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine relationships between a priori-chosen personality traits and the tendency for a manager to rate his/her job performance more favourably than well-acquainted superiors, peers, and subordinates do. Design/methodology/approach - The job performance of 204 managers was evaluated using multi-source (i.e. 360E) ratings (self, subordinates, peers, and superiors). Managers also completed personality measures. Relationships between managers' personality and the tendency for managers to rate their own job performance higher than subordinates, peers, and superiors did were analyzed using advanced regression techniques. Findings - The paper finds that self-superior and self-peer disagreement in performance ratings (i.e. self-rating inflation) was associated with high Achievement and high Self-Esteem. Additionally, self-superior disagreement (i.e. self-rating deflation) was associated with high Anxiety. Self-subordinate disagreement was not associated with self-rater personality. Research limitations/implications - The paper studied a single sample of financial services managers. Generalization requires cross-validation with other occupational groups and organizations. Practical implications - Human resources professionals should be informed that self-superior and self-peer disagreement (i.e. self-rating inflation) in multi-source job performance ratings is potentially beneficial because it is associated with personality traits that can facilitate positive responses to feedback. Peers and superiors should therefore not inflate their ratings of managers in an effort to reduce self-superior and self-peer disagreement in ratings. Originality/value - This study improved upon most previous investigations of this topic by using a field setting, considering a wider range of personality variables, using 360( job performance ratings (self-, supervisor-, peer-, and subordinate-ratings) rather than just a subset of these rating sources, and employing superior statistical procedures.
机译:目的-本文的目的是检验先验选择的人格特质与经理相对于熟悉的上级,同级和下属更能评价其工作绩效的趋势之间的关系。设计/方法/方法-使用多源(即360E)等级(自己,下属,同级和上级)评估了204位经理的工作绩效。管理人员还完成了人格测度。使用高级回归技术分析了经理人格与经理对自己的工作绩效的评价高于下属,同事和上级的倾向之间的关系。调查结果-该论文发现,绩效评估中的自我优越和自我同伴的差异(即自我评估的通货膨胀)与较高的成就和较高的自尊有关。此外,自我优越感(即自我评估放气)与高度焦虑相关。自我服从的分歧与自我评价者的人格无关。研究局限性/含义-本文研究了金融服务经理的单个样本。泛化需要与其他职业团体和组织进行交叉验证。实际意义-应通知人力资源专业人士,多来源工作绩效评估中的自我优劣和自我同伴异议(即自我评估通胀)可能是有益的,因为它与可以促进对反馈的积极回应的人格特质相关。因此,同辈和上级不应夸大其管理者的等级,以减少等级上的自我优越和自我同辈的分歧。原创性/价值-这项研究通过使用现场设置,考虑更广泛的性格变量,使用360(工作绩效等级(自我,主管,同伴和下属等级)而不是而不是这些评分来源的一个子集,并采用了卓越的统计程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号