首页> 外文期刊>Journal of management studies >Explaining Mandate Loss of Regional Headquarters: The Difference between Full and Partial Loss
【24h】

Explaining Mandate Loss of Regional Headquarters: The Difference between Full and Partial Loss

机译:解释区域总部的授权损失:全部损失和部分损失之间的区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The fluidity of regional headquarters (RHQ) mandates is a core aspect of disaggregating HQ activities in MNCs. While slicing' of global value chains has received attention in previous research, the parallel disaggregation of management activities has not. Our longitudinal study of 374 RHQ between 1998 and 2010 redresses this omission by asking why RHQ lose their mandates. We apply the concept of absorptive capacity and find two different explanatory mechanisms for full and partial mandate loss driven by RHQ-specific capabilities and location-specific capabilities. Full mandate loss is associated with deficient RHQ-specific capabilities and realised absorptive capacity. By contrast, partial mandate loss is driven by an RHQ's lack of the location-specific capabilities to respond to local changes, leading to removal of mandates for some subunits only. The distinction between full and partial loss offers a more nuanced and granular explanation of how geographic regions of MNCs are composed.
机译:区域总部(RHQ)任务的流动性是在跨国公司中分解总部活动的核心方面。尽管在先前的研究中已经注意到“分割全球价值链”,但管理活动的并行分解却没有。我们在1998年至2010年间对374个RHQ进行了纵向研究,通过询问为什么RHQ失去了职责来弥补这一遗漏。我们应用吸收能力的概念,并发现由RHQ特定功能和位置特定功能驱动的全部和部分任务损失的两种不同的解释机制。完全的授权损失与RHQ专用功能不足和已实现的吸收能力有关。相比之下,部分任务损失是由RHQ缺乏响应于本地变化的特定于位置的能力所致,导致仅删除某些子单位的任务。全部损失和部分损失之间的区别为跨国公司的地理区域的组成提供了更为细致和细致的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号