首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Management Development >The unfulfilled promise of management education (ME): the role, value and purposes of ME
【24h】

The unfulfilled promise of management education (ME): the role, value and purposes of ME

机译:管理教育(ME)的未兑现承诺:ME的作用,价值和目的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to review the evolution of management education primarily over the last 50 years and seeks to identify the challenges and lessons learned in management education and to assess the potential for change. To gain insight into these issues the authors draw on the perspectives of around 40 key individuals from academia, professional bodies, media, business and students. Design/methodology/approach - The content of the paper is based upon a qualitative analysis of around 40 two-to-three hour interviews of key global players in the management education field. Findings - The key stakeholders in management education are identified as students, business and employers respectively. But in terms of relative stakeholder influence faculty, business and students are the top three influencers. Faculty represent the supply-side whereas business and students represent the demand side of management education. There is evidence that higher tuition fees may increase the power of students and business relative to faculty. The individuals who have had the greatest influence on management education are academics such as Mintzberg and Drucker rather than business school deans or administrators. Institutions such as INSEAD, IMD and Harvard have had the greatest influence. The main issues and challenges identified in Management Education include information technology, globalisation, the role of faculty, competition and business model performance. Few game changing innovations in curricula have occurred in management education raising the question of how change will occur in the future. Originality/value - There are few in-depth, open-ended interview studies of key participants in the field of management education. It adds insights to a range of more reflective literature studies from writers such as Khurana, Mintzberg and Pfeffer.
机译:目的-本文旨在回顾主要在过去50年中管理教育的发展,并试图找出管理教育中的挑战和经验教训,并评估变革的潜力。为了深入了解这些问题,作者借鉴了来自学术界,专业机构,媒体,企业和学生的约40名关键人物的观点。设计/方法/方法-本文的内容基于定性分析,对管理教育领域的全球主要参与者进行了大约40次2至3小时的访谈。调查结果-管理教育的主要利益相关者分别是学生,企业和雇主。但是就利益相关者的相对影响力而言,学院,企业和学生是影响力最大的三位。教师代表供应方,而企业和学生则代表管理教育的需求方。有证据表明,相对于教师而言,较高的学费可能会提高学生和企业的实力。对管理教育影响最大的人是明茨伯格和德鲁克等学者,而不是商学院院长或行政人员。 INSEAD,IMD和哈佛等机构的影响最大。在管理教育中发现的主要问题和挑战包括信息技术,全球化,教师的作用,竞争和商业模式绩效。在管理教育中,很少有改变游戏规则的创新发生在管理教育中,这提出了未来如何发生改变的问题。原创性/价值-在管理教育领域,几乎没有针对主要参与者的深入,开放式访谈研究。它为来自诸如Khurana,Mintzberg和Pfeffer等作家的更具反思性的文学研究提供了见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号