首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Management Development >Research rigor and the gap between academic journals and business practitioners
【24h】

Research rigor and the gap between academic journals and business practitioners

机译:研究严谨性以及学术期刊与商业从业者之间的差距

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper examines the engagement of business practitioners with academic business research. The purpose of this paper is to assess whether there is a gap between academic research and business people, and, if so, how to bridge this gap. Design/methodology/approach - Over 150 senior business practitioners were interviewed, in order to capture their views on the usefulness of academic research to them in their roles as practicing managers. Survey questions covered both their current access and reading of business-related publications and what the ideal academic business journal should be, in terms of access and contents. Findings - Academic journals are not very well known among business professionals. If these professionals could choose, they would like academic journals to be written by experienced business people, to contain business cases and to be accessible on line. Existing academic business journal "repositories," such as Google Scholar, are not mentioned in the survey results. Practical implications - The findings indicate that potential solutions to bridge the gap between academic journals and business practitioners should not be complicated to implement, and would greatly help bring these two communities closer, with mutually enriching results. Originality/value - This paper takes a very pragmatic view of the gap between academic journals and business practitioners, and seeks to assess this gap in terms of how it can be bridged on an everyday basis, rather than take a theoretical approach. It begs for the definition of actionable next steps.
机译:目的-本文研究了商业从业人员对学术商业研究的参与。本文的目的是评估学术研究和商务人士之间是否存在鸿沟,如果有的话,如何弥合这一鸿沟。设计/方法/方法-采访了150多位高级商业从业人员,以了解他们对学术研究对他们作为执业经理的作用的看法。调查问题涵盖了它们当前与商业相关出版物的访问和阅读,以及就访问和内容而言理想的学术商业期刊应该是什么。调查结果-商业专业人士对学术期刊的了解不是很高。如果这些专业人员可以选择,他们希望学术期刊由经验丰富的商人撰写,包含业务案例并可以在线访问。调查结果中未提及现有的学术商业期刊“存储库”,例如Google Scholar。实际意义-研究结果表明,弥合学术期刊和商业从业人员之间差距的潜在解决方案实施起来不应很复杂,并且将大大有助于使这两个社区更加紧密,并相互促进。原创性/价值-本文对学术期刊和商业从业人员之间的差距进行了非常务实的研究,并试图通过每天如何弥补这一差距来评估这种差距,而不是采用理论方法。它要求定义可行的后续步骤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号