首页> 外文期刊>Journal of logic and computation >CERES for first-order schemata
【24h】

CERES for first-order schemata

机译:一阶图式的CERES

获取原文
       

摘要

The cut-elimination method CERES (cut-elimination by resolution) (for first-and higher order classical logic) is based on the notion of a characteristic clause set, which is extracted from an LK-proof and is always unsatisfiable. Aresolution refutation of this clause set can be used as a skeleton for a proof with atomic cuts only (atomic cut normal form). This is achieved by replacing clauses from the resolution refutation by the corresponding projections of the original proof. We present a generalization of CERES (called CERESs) to first-order proof schemata. Proof schemata are parameterized sequences of first-order proofs constructed using primitive recursive definitions. We define a schematic version of the sequent calculus, called LKS, and devise algorithms to extract schematic characteristic formulas and schematic projections from these proof schemata. We also define a schematic resolution calculus for constructing ground refutations of schemata of formulas, which can be applied to refute the schematic characteristic formulas. Finally the projection schemata and resolution schemata are plugged together and one obtains a schematic representation of proofs with only quantifier-free cuts, from which schematic Herbrand sequences can be extracted. A major benefit of CERESs is the extension of cut-elimination to inductively defined proofs: we compare CERESs with standard calculi using induction rules and demonstrate that CERESs is capable of performing cut-elimination where traditional methods fail.
机译:切消除方法CERES(按分辨率进行切消除)(针对一阶和更高阶的经典逻辑)基于特征子句集的概念,该特征子句集是从LK证明中提取的,并且始终无法满足要求。此子句集的分辨率反驳可以用作仅具有原子切割(原子切割法线形式)的证明的框架。这是通过用原始证明的相应投影替换决议驳回中的条款来实现的。我们将CERES(称为CERES)概括为一阶证明模式。证明模式是使用原始递归定义构造的一阶证明的参数化序列。我们定义了后续演算的逻辑示意图版本,称为LKS,并设计了算法来从这些证明模式中抽取逻辑示意图特征公式和逻辑示意图投影。我们还定义了一种用于构造公式图式的地面反驳的示意性分辨率演算,可用于反驳示意性特征公式。最后,将投影图式和分辨率图式插入到一起,并获得仅具有无量词分割的证明的示意图,可以从中提取示意图的Herbrand序列。 CERES的主要好处是将消除切割扩展到归纳定义的证明:我们使用归纳规则将CERES与标准结石进行比较,证明CERES能够在传统方法失败的情况下执行消除切割。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号