首页> 外文期刊>The journal of logical and algebraic methods in programming >Non-dual modal operators as a basis for 4-valued accessibility relations in Hybrid logic
【24h】

Non-dual modal operators as a basis for 4-valued accessibility relations in Hybrid logic

机译:非双模算子作为混合逻辑中的4值可访问性关系的基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The modal operators usually associated with the notions of possibility and necessity are classically duals. This paper aims to defy that duality in a paraconsistent environment, namely in a Belnapian Hybrid logic where both propositional variables and accessibility relations are four-valued. Hybrid logic, which is an extension of Modal logic, incorporates extra machinery such as nominals - for uniquely naming states - and a satisfaction operator - so that the formula under its scope is evaluated in the state whose name the satisfaction operator indicates.In classical Hybrid logic the semantics of negation, when it appears before compound formulas, is carried towards subformulas, meaning that eventual inconsistencies can be found at the level of nominals or propositional variables but appear unrelated to the accessibility relations. In this paper we allow inconsistencies in propositional variables and, by breaking the duality between modal operators, inconsistencies at the level of accessibility relations arise. We introduce a sound and complete tableau system and a decision procedure to check if a formula is a consequence of a set of formulas. Tableaux will be used to extract syntactic models for databases, which will then be compared using different inconsistency measures. We conclude with a discussion about bisimulation. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:通常与可能性和必要性相关联的模态运算符是经典的双重。本文旨在藐视滞后环境中的二元性,即在Belnapian混合逻辑中,其中命题变量和可访问性关系都是四个值。混合逻辑,即模态逻辑的扩展,包括额外的机器,如唯一的命名状态 - 以及满意的操作员 - 以便在令人满意的运算符指示的状态下评估其范围内的公式。在古典混合逻辑否定的语义,当化合物式中出现之前,朝向子公式进行的,这意味着最终的不一致可以在标称值或命题变量的水平中找到,但似乎无关的可及关系。在本文中,我们允许在命题变量中不一致,并且通过破坏模态运营商之间的二元性,出现了无障碍关系水平的不一致。我们介绍一个声音和完整的Tableau系统和决定程序,以检查公式是否是一组公式的后果。 TableAux将用于提取数据库的语法模型,然后使用不同的不一致措施进行比较。我们结束了关于双刺激的讨论。 (c)2021 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号