首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Legal History >The Missing Witness? George V, Competence, Compellability and the Criminal Libel Trial of Edward Frederick Mylius
【24h】

The Missing Witness? George V, Competence, Compellability and the Criminal Libel Trial of Edward Frederick Mylius

机译:失踪的证人?乔治五世(George V)的能力,强制性和爱德华·弗雷德里克·迈利乌斯(Edward Frederick Mylius)的刑事诽谤审判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A criminal libel trial in 1911 set the monarch against one of his subjects. Edward Mylius repeated a rumour that accused King George V of marrying Queen Mary when - secretly - the King had previously married someone else and had three children. The criminal charge, the process used to bring the issue to court, the advice to the King of the relevant ministers (including Winston Churchill as Home Secretary) and the trial itself stretched the boundaries of fairness. The legacy of the trial created a lingering problem. Can the monarch ever be required to face the direct scrutiny of examination by being required to appear as a witness in his or her own court to support a personal complaint?View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2012.698886
机译:1911年,一次刑事诽谤审判将君主定为他的臣民之一。爱德华·迈利乌斯(Edward Mylius)再次谣言指责乔治五世国王与玛丽皇后结婚,当时国王秘密地与他人结婚并育有三个孩子。刑事指控,用于将该问题提交法院的程序,向相关部长的国王(包括担任内政大臣温斯顿·丘吉尔)的建议以及审判本身都扩大了公平范围。审判的遗留问题一直困扰着人们。是否可以要求君主在自己的法庭上作为证人出庭以支持个人投诉,从而面对直接的审查?查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线” ,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2012.698886

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号