首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Labor Research >Review essay — administrative delay at the NLRB: Some modest proposals
【24h】

Review essay — administrative delay at the NLRB: Some modest proposals

机译:评论文章-NLRB的行政延误:一些适度的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

V. Conclusion The latest edition of Miller’s Appraisal provides an updated glimpse into the inner workings of the NLRB. Miller’s observations are knowledgeable and understandable, and his book is an important contribution for academics, the labor bar, and the Board itself. We hope it spurs further study of the Board’s administration of the Act and exploration of ways to improve it. Miller’s pessimism about potential reforms, short of his proposed abolition of the five-member Board in favor of a new labor and employment division of the federal district courts, goes too far. We have suggested a few changes that would make the Board more efficient without affecting the Board’s substantive mission. Hopefully, with further efforts like Miller’s in the future, the Board will effect a consistent improvement upon its somewhat spotty record of efficiency and will keep the NLRA vibrant well into this new century.
机译:V.结论最新版的《米勒评估》提供了对NLRB内部运作的最新了解。 Miller的观察是广博的和可理解的,他的书对学者,劳动标准和董事会本身都有重要贡献。我们希望它能促使人们进一步研究董事会对《法案》的管理,并探索改进该法案的方法。米勒对可能的改革抱有悲观态度,但他提议取消五人组成的董事会以支持联邦地方法院新成立的劳工和就业部门,实在是太过分了。我们提出了一些更改,这些更改将在不影响董事会实质性使命的情况下提高董事会效率。希望通过像Miller今后所做的进一步努力,董事会将在其效率参差不齐的效率记录上取得持续改进,并使NLRA充满活力地进入新世纪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号