首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Labor Research >Glass ceilings or sticky floors? A model of high-income law graduates
【24h】

Glass ceilings or sticky floors? A model of high-income law graduates

机译:玻璃天花板还是粘地板?高收入法学毕业生的典范

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Minorities and females are underrepresented in the top-income quintile of law school graduates. Employing a binary logistic regression model, I examine whether this is due to a“glass ceiling” (an invisible barrier erected by third parties) or a“sticky floor” (self-imposed limitations regarding employment). My major finding is that being female, a minority, or disabled did not significantly reduce one's probability of making the top-income quintile once hours of work, experience, and other factors are taken into account. My findings directly contradict the large body of glass-ceiling literature and support the sticky-floor model. I thank the Law School Admission Council for funding this research. Helpful comments and suggestions were received from Robert Nelson of Northwestern University and the American Bar Foundation, Steven Conroy of the University of West Florida, and R. Kim Craft and Douglas Bonzo of Southern Utah University. The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions or persons listed above.
机译:在法学院毕业生中,收入最高的五分之一人口中少数民族和女性人数不足。我使用二元逻辑回归模型,检查这是由于“玻璃天花板”(由第三方建立的看不见的障碍)还是由于“粘性地板”(关于就业的自我施加的限制)引起的。我的主要发现是,一旦考虑到工作时间,经验和其他因素,女性,少数族裔或残障人士并不会显着降低使高收入五分之一人口的可能性。我的发现直接与大量的玻璃天花板文献相矛盾,并支持粘性地板模型。感谢法学院入学委员会为这项研究提供资金。西北大学的罗伯特·尼尔森和美国律师协会,西佛罗里达大学的史蒂芬·康罗伊以及南犹他大学的R. Kim Craft和Douglas Bonzo收到了有用的评论和建议。这里表达的观点仅是作者的观点,并不一定反映上述机构或个人的观点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Labor Research》 |2003年第4期|p.695-711|共17页
  • 作者

    Joe G. Baker;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:34:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号