首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Labor Research >A “brer rabbit” case for reverse mandated benefits
【24h】

A “brer rabbit” case for reverse mandated benefits

机译:逆向授权福利的“大兔子”案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Reverse mandated benefits is a government-mandated policy that requires employees to provide their employers with benefits that workers would not provide otherwise. Of course, only those benefits would be mandated that are worth more to employers than they cost, as determined by political authorities. My case for such a policy argues that it is at least as sensible as policies mandating that employers provide benefits to their employees that would not be provided otherwise.
机译:反向强制性福利是一项政府强制性的政策,要求员工向雇主提供其原本不会提供的福利。当然,只有那些由政治当局确定的福利,才是雇主所要付出的,其价值要比其付出的代价还多。我针对此类政策的案例认为,这至少与强制雇主为雇员提供福利的政策一样明智,而其他方面则不会提供。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Labor Research》 |2003年第3期|p.437-446|共10页
  • 作者

    Dwight R. Lee;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:34:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号