首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Islamic Studies >Official Ulema and the Politics of Re-Islamization: The Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama, Sharīʿatization and Contested Authority in Post-New Order Aceh1
【24h】

Official Ulema and the Politics of Re-Islamization: The Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama, Sharīʿatization and Contested Authority in Post-New Order Aceh1

机译:乌里玛官方与重新伊斯兰化的政治:新秩序亚齐 1 中的伊斯兰教化和有争议的权威

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article focuses on the position and role of the Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama (MPU; Consultative Assembly of Ulema) in the process of re-Islamization, in the sense of Sharīʿatization, of Aceh in post-New Order Indonesia. Sharīʿatization in Aceh is a complex issue, related not only to religious but also political contestation amongst various elements of Acehnese society. Although a political project of the central government to draw popular support away from the Free Aceh Movement (GAM), which did not have Islamic agenda, it was formulated mainly by official ulema, Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI; Indonesian Council of Ulema), especially from 1998 to 2001, and after 2001 by the MPU. ) Despite the MPU's significant role in the initial phase of Sharīʿatization, and despite the privileged status given to it by the Law on Aceh Governance and local bylaws, the MPU was unable to sustain its prominent role. The MPU was frustrated, this article argues, by the actions of other agents—‘Sharīʿa state apparatuses’ (especially the Sharīʿa Office); ‘secular state apparatuses’ (especially governor and regional parliament); and Islamic and ‘secular’ political parties—during the negotiation and renegotiation of what kind of official Sharīʿa should be implemented. Thus, over the last decade Sharīʿa implementation at the official level has been defined mainly by both Sharīʿa state apparatuses (including the MPU) and secular state apparatuses, rather than by independent dayah-based ulema and Islamist groups. This situation is owed in part to the marginalization of independent ulema and the absence of a radical Islamist movement in Aceh at the beginning of the Sharīʿatization process.
机译:本文着眼于伊斯兰教化后的亚齐在伊斯兰化之后的意义上,在伊斯兰教化的意义上,着重讨论了Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama(MPU; Ulema协商大会)的地位和作用。亚齐的伊斯兰化是一个复杂的问题,不仅与宗教信仰有关,而且与阿塞拜疆社会各组成部分之间的政治斗争有关。尽管中央政府的一项政治计划是从没有伊斯兰议程的自由亚齐运动(GAM)吸引民众的支持,但它主要是由官方乌里玛,印度尼西亚Majelis Ulama印度尼西亚(MUI;印度尼西亚乌里玛理事会)制定的。从1998年到2001年,以及2001年以后由MPU负责。 )尽管万国邮联在伊斯兰化的初期阶段起着重要作用,而且尽管《亚齐治理法》和地方法规赋予它以特权地位,但万国邮联仍无法维持其突出的作用。本文认为,MPU受到其他代理机构“SharīShara国家机构”(特别是Sharīʿa办公室)的行动的挫败。 “世俗国家机构”(尤其是州长和地方议会);伊斯兰和“世俗”政党-在谈判和重新谈判应实施哪种正式的伊斯兰教法期间。因此,在过去的十年中,主要在沙里亚国家机构(包括MPU)和世俗国家机构中定义了沙里亚在官方一级的实施,而不是由独立的以达亚为基地的回教徒和伊斯兰团体来定义。造成这种情况的部分原因是,独立伊斯兰教徒的边缘化以及在伊斯兰教化进程开始之初亚齐没有激进的伊斯兰运动。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Islamic Studies》 |2011年第2期|p.183-214|共32页
  • 作者

    Moch Nur Ichwan2;

  • 作者单位

    Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:21:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号