...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >INTERNET LAW IN THE COURTS
【24h】

INTERNET LAW IN THE COURTS

机译:法院的互联网法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Suppose an online provider allows third parties to upload digital files (which, in this context, would be "phonorecords" for copyright purposes). If no one else obtains one of those files, whether by streaming or download, has there been a distribution? In other words, is merely making available a copyrighted work an exercise of the right to distribute under the Copyright Act? The recent case of SA Music v. Amazon addresses this question. The court said no.The Copyright Act lists the exclusive rights a copyright holder enjoys. One of those rights is to "distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending."MAKING AVAILABLE COPYRIGHTED WORKS ON AMAZON Plaintiffs held the rights in some well-known 20th-century songs (such as "I've Got the World on a String"). They sued Amazon over the presence of unauthorized copies of those musical works on Amazon's music service. Plaintiffs asserted that merely making those files available online was an unauthorized distribution under the Copyright Act. Amazon moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The court granted the motion.
机译:假设在线提供商允许第三方上传数字文件(在此上下文中,该上下文将是版权目的的“榫眼”)。如果没有其他人获得其中一个文件,是否通过流或下载,有分发吗?换句话说,仅仅是有权提供版权所有的努力,担任版权法案的行使权限?最近的SA音乐诉亚马逊解决了这个问题。法院说,版权法案列出了版权所有者享有的独家权利。其中一个权利是将“通过销售或其他所有权转让给公众的版权工作,或通过租赁,租赁或贷款分发给予公众的副本或电话。”在亚马逊原告上提供可版权的作品持有一些良好的权利 - 已知20世纪的歌曲(如“我有一个字符串上的世界”)。他们在亚马逊音乐服务中的那些音乐作品的未经授权副本的情况下起诉亚马逊。原告声称,根据“版权法”在线提供的文件是未经授权的分布。亚马逊搬到解雇未能说明索赔。法院授予议案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号