首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Money and Finance >Does it pay to pay performance fees? Empirical evidence from Dutch pension funds
【24h】

Does it pay to pay performance fees? Empirical evidence from Dutch pension funds

机译:它是否需要支付表演费?荷兰养老基金的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analyze the relation between investment returns and performance fees for 218 Dutch occupational pension funds with an average total of 1090 billion euro in assets under management from 2012 to 2017. Our dataset is free from self-reporting biases and includes total return, excess return and performance fees for six major asset classes. We find no statistical evidence that the returns of pension funds that pay performance fees to asset managers for active investing are significantly higher or lower than the returns of pension funds that do not pay performance fees. This is true for most asset classes and robust if we correct for risk. We also document that large and more specialized pension funds pay less performance fees for a given level of excess return in alternative asset classes such as hedge funds and private equity. This is possibly the result of better negotiation power due to their larger scale or higher level of expertise. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:我们分析了2012年至2017年管理的218只荷兰职业养老基金的平均投资收益与绩效费之间的关系。这些资产平均管理着10900亿欧元。我们的数据集没有自我报告偏差,包括总收益,超额收益和六种主要资产类别的绩效费。我们没有统计证据表明,向绩效管理者支付绩效费以进行积极投资的养老基金的收益显着高于或低于不支付绩效费的养老基金的收益。对于大多数资产类别而言,这都是正确的;如果我们纠正风险,则该方法是可靠的。我们还证明,在对冲基金和私募股权等另类资产类别中,对于给定的超额回报水平,大型且专业化程度更高的养老基金所支付的绩效费要少一些。这可能是由于其规模更大或专业水平更高而谈判能力更强的结果。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号