首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Economic Law >Making the WTO (Not So) Great Again: The Case Against Responding to the Trump Trade Agenda Through Reform of WTO Rules on Subsidies and State Enterprises
【24h】

Making the WTO (Not So) Great Again: The Case Against Responding to the Trump Trade Agenda Through Reform of WTO Rules on Subsidies and State Enterprises

机译:通过WTO关于补贴和国家企业的规则改革,使WTO(不那么)再次成为巨大的意义:毫无抵抗特朗普贸易议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A range of WTO scholars, policy experts, and governmental officials have bought into the notion that the Trump Administration's unilateralism and its assault on China's trade policies and practices could and should be channeled instead into WTO reform efforts. While dealing with China through unilateral tariff hikes and more recently a bilateral phase I agreement, the notion of addressing some concerns through WTO reform has not fallen entirely on a deaf ear in theAdministration. Thus, Japan and the EUhave been able to engage the Administration in an initiative to revise and add newWTOrules in the areas of subsidies, state enterprises, and forced technology transfer. This article offers a critical assessment of this initiative, arguing that by and large the proposed changes will add incoherence to existingWTO rules andmake it more difficult forWTOMembers to engage in economic and industrial policies that are needed, for example, to the address the economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.
机译:一系列WTO学者,政策专家和政府官员已经向概念购买了特朗普政府的单边主义及其对中国贸易政策和做法的攻击,而且应该被纳入WTO改革努力。在通过单边关税徒步旅行的同时,最近一届双边阶段的一项协议,通过WTO改革解决一些问题的概念并没有完全陷入困境的耳聋。因此,日本和欧盟能够在一项倡议中聘请政府在补贴,国务企业和强迫技术转让领域进行修改和添加新世纪。本文提供了对这一倡议的关键评估,争论,通过拟议的更改,拟议的变化将增加对现有的制度规则的不一致,这更加困难地福特莫斯,以便参与所需的经济和产业政策,例如解决问题的经济和工业政策covid-19大流行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号