首页> 外文期刊>Journal of industry competition & trade >Endogenous Market Structures in the Presence of a Socially Responsible Firm
【24h】

Endogenous Market Structures in the Presence of a Socially Responsible Firm

机译:具有社会责任感的公司的内在市场结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We consider the endogenous selection of strategic contracts in an asymmetric duopoly with substitutable goods. the duopoly comprises a typical managerial firm with a sales delegation and a socially responsible firm (CSR firm) with a linear combination of social welfare and quantity as its managerial delegation contract. In particular, we examine how the equilibrium market structure changes from the case wthere both firms adopt sales delegation contracts to the case wthere one of the firms becomes a CSR firm, after the owners of the firms select their strategic contracts. We show that two market structures that are asymmetric with respect to their strategic contracts can become equilibrium market structures under the pure strategic contract class. Furthermore, we consider a unique mixed strategy equilibrium to examine how the risk domination between the two asymmetric equilibrium market structures affects equilibrium selection. there, we find that the competition wthere the firm with the sales delegation and the CSR firm have a price contract and a quantity contract, respectively, risk-dominates the competition wthere the firms have a quantity contract and a price contract, respectively. Finally, by deriving the order of social welfare among the four subgames, we show that the social incentive does not coincide with the private incentive in the robust equilibrium with respect to risk domination in the endogenous selection game of the strategic contracts of the asymmetric duopoly with the firm with a sales delegation and the CSR firm.
机译:我们考虑具有可替代商品的不对称双头垄断中战略合同的内生选择。双头垄断包括一个典型的管理公司,一个销售代表和一个社会责任公司(CSR公司),其社会福利和数量的线性组合作为其管理委托合同。特别是,我们研究了均衡市场结构如何从案例(即两家公司都采用销售委托合同)到案例(其中一家公司成为企业社会责任公司)之后的情况发生了变化。我们表明,相对于其战略合同而言不对称的两个市场结构可以在纯战略合同类别下变为均衡市场结构。此外,我们考虑了一个独特的混合策略均衡,以检验两个非对称均衡市场结构之间的风险支配如何影响均衡选择。在这里,我们发现,与销售代表和企业社会责任公司之间的竞争分别具有价格合同和数量合同,在企业具有数量合同和价格合同的情况下,竞争主导风险。最后,通过推导四个子博弈中的社会福利顺序,我们证明了在不对称双寡头战略合同的内生选择博弈中,在风险支配的稳健均衡中,社会激励与私人激励不重合。有销售代表的公司和CSR公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号