首页> 外文期刊>Journal for general philosophy of science >Carnap and Kuhn: On the Relation between the Logic of Science and the History of Science
【24h】

Carnap and Kuhn: On the Relation between the Logic of Science and the History of Science

机译:卡尔纳普和库恩:科学逻辑与科学史之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper offers a refutation of J. C. Pinto de Oliveira's recent critique of revisionist Carnap scholarship as giving undue weight to two brief letters to Kuhn expressing his interest in the latter's work. First an argument is provided to show that Carnap and Kuhn are by no means divided by a radical mismatch of their conceptions of the rationality of science as supposedly evidenced by their stance towards the distinction of the contexts of discovery and justification. This is followed by an argument to the effect that the fact that Carnap's own work concentrated on formal aspects of scientific theories does not licence the conclusion that he thought historical investigations and concerns irrelevant for what we nowadays would rightly call "philosophy of science".
机译:本文驳斥了J. C. Pinto de Oliveira最近对修正主义卡尔纳普奖学金的批评,因为他对给库恩的两封简短信函表示了过分的重视,表达了他对后者的工作的兴趣。首先,有一个论点表明,卡尔纳普和库恩绝不会因他们对科学合理性概念的根本错位而分裂,据推测,这是由他们对发现和证明背景的区分立场所证明的。接着是一个论点,即卡纳普自己的工作集中在科学理论的形式方面这一事实并不能使他得出这样的结论,即他认为历史研究和关注与我们今天正确地称为“科学哲学”无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号