首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Quantifying the Sensitivity of Scent Detection Dogs To Identify Fecal Contamination on Raw Produce
【24h】

Quantifying the Sensitivity of Scent Detection Dogs To Identify Fecal Contamination on Raw Produce

机译:量化气味检测犬的敏感性,以识别生农产品上的粪便污染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Consumption of raw produce commodities has been associated with foodborne outbreaks in the United States. In a recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report outlining the incidence of food-related outbreaks from 1998 to 2008, produce of all kinds were implicated in 46% of illnesses and 23% of deaths. Methods that quickly identify fecal contamination of foods, including produce, will allow prioritization of samples for testing during investigations and perhaps decrease the time required to identify specific brands or lots. We conducted a series of trials to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of scent detection dogs to accurately identify fecal contamination on raw agricultural commodities (romaine lettuce, spinach, cilantro, and roma tomatoes). Both indirect and direct methods of detection were evaluated. For the indirect detection method, two dogs were trained to detect contamination on gauze pads previously exposed to produce contaminated with feces. For the direct detection method, two dogs were trained to identify fecal contamination on fresh produce. The indirect method did not result in acceptable levels of sensitivity except for the highest levels of fecal contamination (25 g of feces). Each dog had more difficulty detecting fecal contamination on cilantro and spinach than on roma tomatoes. For the direct detection method, the dogs exhibited >75% sensitivity for detecting ≥0.25 g of feces on leafy greens (cilantro, romaine lettuce, and spinach) and roma tomatoes, with sensitivity declining as the amount of feces dropped below 0.025 g. We determined that use of a scent detection dog to screen samples for testing can increase the probability of detecting ≥0.025 g of fecal contamination by 500 to 3,000% when samples with fecal contamination are rare (≤1%).
机译:在美国,原材料商品的消费与食源性暴发有关。在疾病控制与预防中心最近的一份报告中,概述了1998年至2008年与食物有关的暴发事件,各种产品涉及46%的疾病和23%的死亡。快速识别食品(包括农产品)粪便污染的方法将允许对样品进行优先排序以在调查期间进行测试,并且可能会减少识别特定品牌或批次所需的时间。我们进行了一系列试验,以鉴定嗅觉犬的敏感性和特异性,以准确识别生农产品(长叶莴苣,菠菜,香菜和罗马番茄)的粪便污染。评价了间接和直接检测方法。对于间接检测方法,对两只狗进行了培训,以检测先前接触过产生粪便污染的纱布的污染物。对于直接检测方法,训练了两只狗以识别新鲜农产品上的粪便污染。除了最高水平的粪便污染(25 g粪便)以外,间接方法没有导致可接受的敏感性水平。每只狗比罗马番茄更难检测到香菜和菠菜中的粪便污染。对于直接检测方法,这些狗对绿叶蔬菜(香菜,长叶莴苣和菠菜)和罗马番茄上检测到≥0.25 g的粪便表现出> 75%的灵敏度,当粪便量降至0.025 g以下时,灵敏度下降。我们确定,当稀有粪便污染的样本很少(≤1%)时,使用气味检测犬筛选样本进行检测可以将检测到≥0.025g粪便污染的可能性提高500%至3,000%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2014年第1期|6-14|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Western Institute for Food Safety and Security, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, 1089 Veterinary Medicine Drive, Davis, California 95616;

    Western Institute for Food Safety and Security, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, 1089 Veterinary Medicine Drive, Davis, California 95616;

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Food and Veterinary Medicine, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993;

    Falco K-9 Academy, 615 Berry Street, Brea, California 92821;

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Partnerships, Rockville, Maryland 20857;

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Los Angeles District Office, Irvine, California 92620, USA;

    Western Institute for Food Safety and Security, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, 1089 Veterinary Medicine Drive, Davis, California 95616;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:25:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号