首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Investigation into Possible Differences in Salmonella Prevalence in the Peripheral Lymph Nodes of Cattle Derived from Distinct Production Systems and of Different Breed Types
【24h】

Investigation into Possible Differences in Salmonella Prevalence in the Peripheral Lymph Nodes of Cattle Derived from Distinct Production Systems and of Different Breed Types

机译:不同生产类型和不同生产系统的牛外周淋巴结中沙门氏菌流行的可能差异的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Previous research demonstrated significant variation in the prevalence of Salmonella in peripheral lymph nodes (LNs) of feedlot cattle and cull cows, with greater prevalence in feedlot cattle. Therefore, we performed experiments to investigate whether these differences in Salmonella prevalence in subiliac LNs are due to, or influenced by, breed, which in many respects is a proxy for the production system in which the animal is derived. Holstein steers are a by-product of dairy systems, and beef steers are an intended product of commercial beef operations. For the first experiment, Holstein and beef steers originating from the same feedlot and harvested on the same day were sampled. Of the 467 Holstein and 462 beef cattle LNs collected, 62.1 % of Holstein and 59.7% of beef cattle samples harbored Salmonella (P = 0.46; qualitative culture), with 51.2 and 48.9% of samples containing quantifiable concentrations (P = 0.49), respectively. The concentration of Salmonella within the LN followed a decreasing trend over the collection period (May to October), averaging 1.4 log CFU/g of LN for both Holstein and beef cattle samples (P = 0.78). In a second experiment, we compared 100% Brahman cattle to their beef cattle counterparts, as we hypothesized that the resistance of Brahman cattle to insects may reduce Salmonella transmission via biting insects. Of the 42 Brahman and 31 beef cattle LNs collected, the concentration of Salmonella within the LN averaged 3.0 log CFU/g for Brahman cattle and 2.9 log CFU/ g for beef cattle samples (P = 0.30). Using qualitative culture, we recovered Salmonella from 100% of LNs from Brahman cattle and 97% of beef cattle samples (P = 0.25). Results of this research indicate that the differences observed are not due to breed and are likely a function of age, immune function, or other factors yet to be identified. Understanding which cattle are more likely to harbor Salmonella within LNs will aid in targeting both pre- and postharvest intervention strategies.
机译:先前的研究表明,育肥牛和剔除牛外周淋巴结(LNs)中沙门氏菌的患病率存在​​显着差异,而育肥牛的患病率更高。因此,我们进行了实验,以调查这些ilia虫LN中沙门氏菌患病率的差异是否是由于品种引起的或受其影响的,而该品种在许多方面可作为动物衍生的生产系统的代表。荷斯坦stein牛是乳制品系统的副产品,牛肉ste牛是商业牛肉生产的预期产品。对于第一个实验,对来自同一饲养场并在同一天收获的荷斯坦牛和牛肉beef进行了采样。在收集到的467个荷斯坦牛和462个牛牛LN中,荷斯坦沙门氏菌的荷斯坦牛血清样本占62.1%,定性培养的牛肉牛样本占59.7%(定性培养),分别含有51.2%和48.9%的可量化浓度样本(P = 0.49)。 。 LN中沙门氏菌的浓度在收集期间(5月至10月)呈下降趋势,荷斯坦和肉牛样品的LN平均为1.4 log CFU / g LN(P = 0.78)。在第二个实验中,我们将100%的婆罗门牛与肉牛进行了比较,因为我们假设婆罗门牛对昆虫的抗性可能会减少通过咬昆虫的沙门氏菌传播。在收集的42个婆罗门和31个肉牛LN中,婆罗门牛的LN中沙门氏菌的平均浓度为3.0 log CFU / g,肉牛样品的平均浓度为2.9 log CFU / g(P = 0.30)。通过定性培养,我们从100%的婆罗门牛LN和97%的肉牛样品中回收了沙门氏菌(P = 0.25)。这项研究的结果表明,观察到的差异不是由于品种引起的,可能与年龄,免疫功能或其他尚未确定的因素有关。了解哪些牛更可能在LN内携带沙门氏菌,将有助于针对收获前和收获后的干预策略。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2015年第11期|2081-2084|共4页
  • 作者单位

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845;

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845;

    International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 42141, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA;

    International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 42141, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA;

    International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 42141, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA;

    International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 42141, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA;

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:25:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号