首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Benchmarking Global Food Safety Performances: The Era of Risk Intelligence
【24h】

Benchmarking Global Food Safety Performances: The Era of Risk Intelligence

机译:基准全球食品安全绩效:风险情报时代

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Food safety data segmentation and limitations hamper the world's ability to select, build up, monitor, and evaluate food safety performance. Currently, there is no metric that captures the entire food safety system, and performance data are not collected strategically on a global scale. Therefore, food safety benchmarking is essential not only to help monitor ongoing performance but also to inform continued food safety system design, adoption, and implementation toward more efficient and effective food safety preparedness, responsiveness, and accountability. This comparative study identifies and evaluates common elements among global food safety systems. It provides an overall world ranking of food safety performance for 17 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) countries, illustrated by 10 indicators organized across three food safety risk governance domains: risk assessment (chemical risks, microbial risks, and national reporting on food consumption), risk management (national food safety capacities, food recalls, food traceability, and radionuclides standards), and risk communication (allergenic risks, labeling, and public trust). Results show all countries have very high food safety standards, but Canada and Ireland, followed by France, earned excellent grades relative to their peers. However, any subsequent global ranking study should consider the development of survey instruments to gather adequate and comparable national evidence on food safety.
机译:食品安全数据的细分和局限性阻碍了全球选择,建立,监控和评估食品安全绩效的能力。当前,尚无可涵盖整个食品安全系统的指标,并且尚未在全球范围内战略性地收集绩效数据。因此,食品安全基准测试不仅对于监视正在进行的绩效至关重要,而且对于持续食品安全系统的设计,采用和实施,也有助于朝着更有效,更有效的食品安全准备,响应能力和问责制迈进。这项比较研究确定并评估了全球食品安全体系中的共同要素。它提供了17个经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家在食品安全绩效方面的全球排名,并在三个食品安全风险治理领域中组织了10个指标:风险评估(化学风险,微生物风险和国家报告)有关食品消费的信息),风险管理(国家食品安全能力,食品召回,食品可追溯性和放射性核素标准)和风险交流(致敏风险,标签和公众信任)。结果显示,所有国家/地区的食品安全标准都很高,但加拿大和爱尔兰(其次是法国)相对于其他国家/地区获得了优异的评分。但是,任何随后的全球排名研究都应考虑开发调查工具,以收集有关食品安全的充分且可比的国家证据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2015年第10期|1896-1913|共18页
  • 作者单位

    The Conference Board of Canada, Centre for Food in Canada, 255 Smyth Road Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M7 and The University of Guelph, College of Business and Economics, MacDonald Institute Building, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1;

    The Conference Board of Canada, Centre for Food in Canada, 255 Smyth Road Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M7 and The University of Guelph, College of Business and Economics, MacDonald Institute Building, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:25:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号