...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Family Violence >Examining an Extension of Johnson’s Hypothesis: Is Male Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence More Underreported than Female Violence? Item Non-Response in the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods
【24h】

Examining an Extension of Johnson’s Hypothesis: Is Male Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence More Underreported than Female Violence? Item Non-Response in the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods

机译:研究约翰逊假说的一个延伸:男性亲密伴侣的暴力行为比女性暴力事件少报了吗?芝加哥邻里地区人类发展项目中的无回应项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines two hypotheses about under-reporting in intimate partner violence data. The first hypothesis holds that significant amounts of under-reporting of intimate partner violence occur due to stigma. The second examines the empirical evidence behind Johnson’s (Journal of Marriage and the Family 57:238–294, 1995) contention that controversial findings of equal rates of intimate partner violence perpetration among men and women occur through a combination of heterogeneity in type of intimate partner violence and missing data. E.M. and Data Augmentation are used to correct for item non-response in the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods. Strong support is found for general under-reporting; weak support is found for greater under-reporting of male violence. Keywords Intimate partner violence - Domestic violence - Missing data - Multiple imputation
机译:本文研究了两个关于亲密伴侣暴力数据报道不足的假设。第一个假设认为,由于耻辱,亲密伴侣的暴力行为大量漏报。第二部分研究了约翰逊(Journal of Marriage and Family)57:238–294,1995)背后的经验证据,即有争议的结果是男女之间平等的同性伴侣暴力发生率相等,这是由于不同类型的亲密伴侣共同产生的暴力和数据丢失。 E.M.和数据增强用于纠正芝加哥邻里地区人类发展项目中的无回应项目。普遍存在漏报的强烈支持;人们发现对男性暴力的报道不足的支持很弱。关键词亲密伴侣暴力-家庭暴力-数据丢失-多重插补

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号